Forum:Peer Review

<<< Back to Logical Sector • <<< Back to Forum

I thought we might set up a peer review system to help articles be better. It would probably have to have different categories like "random" and "tiny" and "epic" and even "AID." I don't really know. I wouldn't want to see us become another Uncyc, but some review might be helpful if it could be done without turning us into a fascist state. I wouldn't want it to go too far and begin mass deletion or anything, just make things better if we can. I didn't know if there'd be interest in this or not, either being willing to submit articles or being willing to do the reviewing but there it is.--MathPoet 18:21, 11 Farbleum 2008 (UTC)

As one of the top reviewers in Uncyc I'd be glad to help out :) on condition that it has a hilarious pun as its name. :P -- 09:08, 12 Farbleum 2008 (UTC)

I wouldn't be against it though I don't think we should place too much emphasis on it like those hotheads at Uncyc. By the way, did anyone see the argument about one liners over there? -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 21:30, 12 Farbleum 2008 (UTC)

If we are gonna do a pee review, feel free to steal my table i made for them at uncyc. with its pritty colours and stuff, ooo shiny.--Silent PenguinLeave Me Alone 15:36, 13 Farbleum 2008 (UTC)

It is awfully shiny... AND I AM NOT A HOTHEAD I SWEAR AND NEITHER ARE THE REST OF US AND IF YOU SAY IT AGAIN I WILL KILL EVERYONE AAAARRRRRRRRRGGGGHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!! –TLB ^{(Tick Tock) (Contribs)} 22:16, 14 Farbleum 2008 (UTC)

I DIDNT SAY ANYTHING DONT KILL ME AHHHH Oh and im all for this idea. I thought of it before too. And i am willing to contribute to reveiw a ton.--|Fonchezzz| Quacking| 00:04, 17 Farbleum 2008 (UTC)

I'll be For it as long as it further legitimizes Self-Noms on VFH. --~~~~ 00:49, 17 Farbleum 2008 (UTC)

They cant really be more legit than they are now, i mean, we allow them, under any pritty much any conditions, but only because it isnt abused much, any users that do abuse the system are dealt with on an individual basis.--Silent PenguinLeave Me Alone 02:11, 17 Farbleum 2008 (UTC)

So everything should be fine. Anyone else? What do we call it? The Pitypot, perhaps? Just kidding.--MathPoet 14:50, 17 Farbleum 2008 (UTC)

Or were you? I can see that ending up being the name... ;) -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 17:35, 17 Farbleum 2008 (UTC)

I tweaked the tempate i made before to work a bit more towards our wiki, but if you can see anything i have missed, feel free to comment:

Concept:	10	As long as people stick to their guns, and keep it active, then its a fantastical idea.
Execution:	2	So far, little to no effort has been put in, we are such lazy people. We just seem to talk about stuff then lose interest
Grammar and Formatting:	6	some users have let the forum page down in this respect
Images:	1	Pff, there arn't any, sadly, zero isnt supported, so dont use it
Miscellany:	10	if nothing applies set this one on ten
Final Score:	29	We really need to figure out what the hell we are doing
Reviewer:	Silent PenguinLeave Me Alone 13:44, 21 Farbleum 2008 (UTC)

--Silent PenguinLeave Me Alone 13:44, 21 Farbleum 2008 (UTC)

Points to Seppy for the topical comment! I might vote for him on IOTM just for that... Anyhoo, I just made the first comment on Kippers's Walt Disney article. -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 12:34, 23 Farbleum 2008 (UTC)