Forum:Testostereich, admin?

From Illogicopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Testo-"the balls"-ostereich has asked to rule over you all be an admin, should he get it, you stab him in the back decide.

VOTING REGULATIONS
Extra regulations currently apply:
There is voting currently taking place below this template, So here are the voting basics:
  • Users are permitted one vote each.
  • Please clearly state whether your addition is a for, an against or a comment.
  • Remember to sign and to update the vote count.
  • Nominations count as a vote for unless specified as "Neutral" or "Against".
  • Take care not to overdo self-nomination.
  • If you wish to change your vote, then cross out the previous using the <s> tags.
  • Frog-infested pineapples are not allowed in the voting area until they have been de-frogged.
Click here for more details





note: Testo-"the balls"-ostereich cannot vote on this vote, we know he would vote for himself after trying to look modest, so why disillusion ourselves?

--Silent Penguin 21:05, 25 Serpeniver 2007 (UTC)

I wish they were so honest at Uncyc. -- Hindleyak  Converse?blogClick here! 18:57, 26 Serpeniver 2007 (UTC)

da votage[edit source]

Score: 4 cajillion
  • KICK-IN-THE-BALLS FOR! Testicles deserves adminship as much as the banana up in the logo, and I vote that for all his mad writing skills he should be rewarded with the ability to pee on ban upstanding members vandals, and to smoke devour and delete innocent beings articles. --Sir Asema Politics Complaint Inbox or Outbox
  • Z'AGAINST! I was told asking for adminship denies adminship, no matter how good a candidate may or may not be. Look at Insineratehymn over at Uncyc for a perfect example of someone who so sorely deserves sysophood, yet was denied on grounds of simply asking to be one. This is an unwritten (and in some places, written in big red text) law of the Intranet. --~~~~ 21:39, 25 Serpeniver 2007 (UTC)
  • For - he has hardly shown the kind of desperation that I'd consider a warning sign (excessive begging: a no-no; showing some interest: absolutely fine. if Uncyc works as strictly as TKF says, that's one wrong for us not to copy, IMO), and he has long been one who knows the cheese. In short, he's a standing, solid candidate, and if the time has come for the sinister Adminatii to grow once again, I think he'd make a good choice for the next in line. --The Divine Fluffalizer 22:32, 25 Serpeniver 2007 (UTC)
  • For-ish. I'm all for teh great testicles being an admin. My only slight gripe is the admin-to-non admin ratio really. There are, probably, enough admins already (look at the amount of admins that run Uncyc for example. There's like two handfuls of admins in comparison with a constant stream of edits from thousands (probably) of users. Still, this said, we're not uncyc... MetalFlower.jpg
  • For. Normally I'd go with Fruitcake on this and say people who ask shouldn't get. However I feel Testicles should have been opped by now and it's only the admininstration's fault he hasn't been. So yeah, covering up my own mistakes. Plus he's perfect admin material, ie he gets involved in discussions, writes and edits loads of articles etc. -- Hindleyak  Converse?blogClick here! 18:57, 26 Serpeniver 2007 (UTC)


Eh, Eh, Eh EHHHH i didnt get to vote. I VOTE FOR--Romanducky.jpg|Fonchezzz| Quacking|Smile no.jpg 00:06, 14 Novelniver 2007 (UTC)

Meh, I might as well add it to the tally anyway. -- Hindleyak  Converse?blogClick here! 19:45, 14 Novelniver 2007 (UTC)