| Score: 3 (5-2)
|
Nomination by Snarglefoop (talk) 02:10, 10 Farbleum 2014 (UTC)
|
| For:
|
- For Such a precise, dryly realistic portrayal of Wikipedia blocking policy in action surely deserves to be
highlighted featured Snarglefoop (talk) 02:10, 10 Farbleum 2014 (UTC)
- Self-for can I vote for it please? Even though I'm not a rollbacker? ❦ Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 02:12, 10 Farbleum 2014 (UTC)
- For - Like it, like it, like it.
 (kaizum me) 14:11, 4 Jeremy 2016 (UTC)
- For simsilikesims (talk) 23:58, 19 Octodest 2016 (UTC)
- For. Also, am I allowed to add this to the Madness category? felis lupis (talk) 20:48, 23 Farbleum 2017 (UTC)
- Sure. (kaizum me) 01:10, 24 Farbleum 2017 (UTC)
|
| Against:
|
- I'm so, so sorry. I put off voting on this just so I didn't have to make this decision. --T3 04:07, 7 Jumbly 2014 (UTC)
- Why are you sorry? It's just an article. ❦ Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 04:14, 7 Jumbly 2014 (UTC)
- I am "sorry" because I hate voting against articles that technically have nothing wrong with them, but I just don't like enough to vote "For" on. Additionally, I am an overly-apologetic person, and I put the two "so's" so it sounds like the Tenth Doctor, which is a reference I only made for my amusement. --T3 06:14, 7 Jumbly 2014 (UTC)
- Nope.avi
 Operator XY - (Conversal :: Editations - 7,284 and counting!) 7-12-15
- Vincent Lombardi, this made me cry a little, sorry
|
| Comments:
|
- Hey! It's got an image now! Can I vote for it a second time, since this makes it sort of different and stuff? Snarglefoop (talk) 23:33, 22 Farbleum 2014 (UTC)
|
