| Score: 3 (4-1)
|
Nomination by mwow513 • My Articles! • Talk to me 03:51, 16 Aym 2009 (UTC)
|
| For:
|
- NOM and FOR Definitely one of the best articles ive evur read. Should be EPIC. mwow513 • My Articles! • Talk to me 03:51, 16 Aym 2009 (UTC)
- Shelf FWOAR! I worked my rectum off on this one. EPIC IT! --T3 03:55, 16 Aym 2009 (UTC)
- I hate having to support the competition in the quest for features, but this was just fantastic. ~ ♥ ♠ ♦ ♣
- For made me laugh at most parts, shame about the toaster. I loved that thing! DG |Chatty Chaps| 20:52, 16 Aym 2009 (UTC)
|
| Against:
|
- Sorrry,
I'd say it was because of the poor formatting, but the writing style just dudn't appeal to me. --Testostereich • (ballsack) 09:50, 16 Aym 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments:
|
- I'm not trying to change TReich's vote but the bad formatting was on purpose because the article it self is random. --T3 15:26, 16 Aym 2009 (UTC)
- :P Read the reason again --Testostereich • (ballsack) 15:32, 16 Aym 2009 (UTC)
- I'll change the reason to sound more what I intended, but T3, I wouldn't vote against something just on formatting, abstain sure, but against no. I'm just not a big fan of this article. The style reminded me of the way someone I don't particularly like used to speak. --Testostereich • (ballsack) 15:39, 16 Aym 2009 (UTC)
|