Illogicopedia talk:History

From Illogicopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Heh, I was just thinking about this the other day. I'm gonna add this to the FAQs. -- Hindleyak  Converse?blogClick here! 10:20, 26 Aym 2007 (UTC)

You know, I'm thinking that there are some things that really don't have to be completely Logical or completely Insane. Our history page can be somewhat goofy as long as it still gets the basic points across. Maybe we should make a Semi-Logical category for these kinds of pages or something, where people are allowed to edit to make it funnier or more nonsensical as long as they don't makes the message unreadable (i mean make it so people can't understand the point) is this making any sense to anyone? --Nerd42 16:09, 24 Octodest 2007 (UTC)

Semi-logical, eh? That might work. For now, I've modified the sensible template so that all articles with the tag are added to category:Sensible articles, which needed doing for a bit. -- Hindleyak  Converse?blogClick here! 18:21, 24 Octodest 2007 (UTC)

Well, I didn't mean I think we should get rid of the Logical category entirely ... i'm saying we should have logical, semi-logical and insane and should choose a category appropriate for the page type. (i.e. regular content is insane, policy pages are logical and general information about the community like our history page should probably be semi-logical) --Nerd42 15:52, 26 Octodest 2007 (UTC)

ERA of EPICS[edit source]

Just wondering why the epics weren't at all mentioned under that seemingly epic based title? :P Testostereich(ballsack) 10:12, 24 Arche 2008 (UTC)

Epics added, it was 3:00 in the morning, i couldnt be arsed.--Silent Penguin 19:33, 24 Arche 2008 (UTC)

Also, I think the artticle quality has improved, and why do we neeed uncyclopedia to escape the sewers? --Testostereich(ballsack) 10:13, 24 Arche 2008 (UTC)

yeah, it has recently, in the last three or so weeks, but its never like it was in the epic era. as for uncyc, it would be a shame for it to go to shit--Silent Penguin 19:33, 24 Arche 2008 (UTC)

Can I just say (RE the new sections) [A serious message! Wow, I wonder how long this title box will go...][edit source]

That a longer article doesn't necessarily mean a better one - some ramble on for paragraphs when they could have been summed up in a few sentences. Remember our original goal of embracing one-liners... we don't wanna promote redundancy. -- Hindleyak  Converse?blogClick here! 14:57, 29 Arche 2008 (UTC)

Redundancy FTW, i see you haven't looked at the time most of those where written. bloody late at night, as far as i remember, it wasn't that redundant might be a bit rambling. Im an engineer, not an english student :P --Silent Penguin 15:26, 29 Arche 2008 (UTC)
Late at night = the BEST time to ramble. Ooooh yessss. I think I might have been on about the repetitive articles but I really can't remember, it was four months ago. Meh. -- Hindleyak  Converse?blogClick here! 11:03, 25 Ergust 2008 (UTC)

I would send money....[edit source]

...but I have dollars... not Euros.... Sorry.... --->T3<--- 23:29, 24 Ergust 2008 (UTC)

Dunno if the currency matters that much, but thanks for the offer! -- Hindleyak  Converse?blogClick here! 11:02, 25 Ergust 2008 (UTC)

Yay[edit source]

For apathy! -- Hindleyak  Converse?blogClick here! 18:26, 12 Aym 2010 (UTC)

:D If users really cared about stuff we wouldn't have much of a community left Testostereich(ballsack) 18:43, 12 Aym 2010 (UTC)

Too much detail?[edit source]

Do we really need to have the site's official history be this detailed? I mean, it's great prose but it seems kinda useless to have a month-by-month breakdown! Do it by year, or semester or something. --Nerd42 03:16, 30 Serpeniver 2010 (UTC)

Odd... I was kind of wishing it went into more detail as I read it. Such insanity does deserve proper going into, after all. On the other hand, having a summary overview with links to in-depth sections might be nice, too...
On the other other hand, the odds of anyone actually getting around to that seem rather slim. ~ Pointy.png *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20100930 - 14:34 (UTC)
It may one day happen, though with every passing day I lose a little bit more memory of the olden days as I replace it with the controls for FIFA 11.
Also, I note this thing needs to be updated for Summer 2010, though whether anything will happen is anyone's guess. -- Hindleyak  Converse?blogClick here! 18:38, 1 Octodest 2010 (UTC)
You could update it. Like, right now. Like I could write those three uncyclopedia articles I said I would... like, right now...
Okay, that's not going to happen. Lovely. But did anything interesting happen during the summer? Fill it in for us new folks! C'mon! You know you want to... ~ Pointy.png *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101002 - 03:35 (UTC)