Forum talk:The Illogic Pickle 4.1

It's about bloody time. —rms talk 11:28, 21 Yoon 2011 (UTC)

Nearly thought the deadline was today... --Silent PenguinLeave Me Alone 16:24, 22 Yoon 2011 (UTC)

Extension

Since the latest Roberto incident wiped out almost a week of editing time, would it be appropriate to add a few days to the deadline date? -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 10:29, 12 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)

Last chance for objections, otherwise I'm gonna extend the deadline to 29 Jumbly. -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 10:58, 18 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)

Please do, especially as the site's still bloody sluggish. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) 19:53, 18 Jumbly 2011

It probably slowed because I left for two weeks, pfft. —rms talk 01:55, 19 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)

Judges?

Am I just blind or does the page not tell us who will be judging this shindig? —rms talk 17:04, 28 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)

You are blind. --Silent PenguinLeave Me Alone 12:21, 30 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)

Aww Man

Can I enter Algorithm even though The Bard added like less than seven words? --Skate1168 (Talk) 19:52, 28 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)

Nay. You have to make your own article, in your own userspace. Quick, you still have a couple hours! —rms talk 22:44, 28 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure if I can. Algorithm is my best article yet, and I need an idea.

Can you throw me an idea XD --Skate1168 (Talk) 23:05, 28 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)

My Collection of Living, Breathing Candles—-a vague description of five individual living candles, their daily activities, and repeated homicide charges; Bear barn blast battle—Rather self explanatory, but make sure to throw in something about little green hobbit people; Rubber band theory—If you're at all familiar with the string theory, this is an jiggly play on it. Everything is 10x more elastic in the universe. —rms talk 23:13, 28 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)

Wow, thanks! I'll think I'll write all of these, but one for teh pickle for now... --Skate1168 (Talk) 00:38, 29 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)

Oh well...

I am out of time. I will still write those articles. When's the next pickle? --Skate1168 (Talk) 00:40, 29 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)

They used to be held twice a year, and it would be great if we could get back to that. I'd like to see another one in November. --The Bard of Illogicopedia 00:54, 29 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)

Agreed. --Skate1168 (Talk) 02:21, 29 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)

Wait!

Do I have until tonight at 0:00? --Skate1168 (Talk) 01:28, 30 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)

No, the contest closed at 00:00 UTC time, or about 1 hour and 30 minutes ago. See http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=current%20utc%20time ~ The Bard of Illogicopedia 01:32, 30 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)

:( Dang UTC time. I guess I'll wait... --Skate1168 (Talk) 01:40, 30 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)

Strangled Chicken

Is the Strangled Chicken being awarded this year? With his last-minute entry, I suspect that HelloolleH is vying to retain his title from 3.1, although his entry is much too good this time. ~ The Bard of Illogicopedia 15:20, 2 Ergust 2011 (UTC)

Strangled chicken, strangled schmicken.

(That means yes.) —rms talk 17:52, 2 Ergust 2011 (UTC)

Damn, if I'd known about that thing, I'd have put even less effort into mine than I did. Somehow. ~ 18:55, 2 Ergust 2011

I put as little effort into my entry as possible.

Really. I had a pre-made machine placed into my room, and the only effort I had to put into it was pushing the big blue button on it, which was the auto-write button. Made the whole article for me. Minimal effort. —rms talk 19:14, 2 Ergust 2011 (UTC)

Getting/assembling/whatever the machine probably took effort, though. ~ 04:37, 3 Ergust 2011

"Pre-made". It was delivered automatically. I thought about it, and it was delivered. There's some effort. —rms talk 04:49, 3 Ergust 2011 (UTC)

Thinking takes considerable effort, in fact. It's like trying to move a walrus with a spoon. At least, that's my experience. Having thought about that to bring up the memory, I must now rest my spoon, though. Oof. ~ 05:39, 3 Ergust 2011

I once thought of a bucket fool of spoons, but that bucket was resting on a spoon in a an even larger bucket full of spoons. I sweated out two liters of water that day. —rms talk 05:45, 3 Ergust 2011 (UTC)

Into which bucket? ~ 19:18, 4 Ergust 2011

Oh, I don't know. I was too busy paying attention to other things. —rms talk 23:35, 4 Ergust 2011 (UTC)

Uncle Bimbo

A couple of people have expressed their surprise at how low Uncle Bimbo ranked. So, let me give my take on why. It was a great, consistant article, and we did enjoy reading it. The problem came down to the categories, and in each category, other more directed articles sadly beat it to the post. Thats to say, Honourable mentions aren't necessarily any worse than the articles that won each category, it's just that we couldn't fit them anywhere specific. Maybe we need to address this with something like a "Best in show" or "somewhere in-between" category next time. What do you think? --Silent PenguinLeave Me Alone 13:04, 6 Ergust 2011 (UTC)

Bimbo could have easily got a runner-up prize, I think, but consensus was that HelloolleH's was marginally more daring, and yet *not* at the same time. It got us thinking, anyway. Was a very close call, but if it's any consolation, I see Uncle Bimbo as more of a front page feature than Slipping My Pickle In. The Pickle winners don't usually get an automatic front page place, remember, and with more of an emphasis on generating --for want of a better word-- featurable content, it's not necessarily a bad thing that it ranked lower. As a (UK-centric) real life example, the most entertaining Premier League football team last year were Arsenal, but they only finished fourth in the league and won no silverware whatsoever. However, I know I'd prefer to watch them over Man United any day. -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 13:24, 6 Ergust 2011 (UTC)

I'M GOING TO BURN WHOEVER DIDN'T LET MY ARTICLE BE RUNNER UP —rms talk 18:56, 6 Ergust 2011 (UTC)

Sporting.--Silent PenguinLeave Me Alone 11:39, 7 Ergust 2011 (UTC)

Now Seppy. You're not being very understanding. Try to see it from his perspective: 23 stars just isn't very much. In fact, it's barely more than the rest of the Pickle competitors combined. ;) ~ The Bard of Illogicopedia 11:57, 7 Ergust 2011 (UTC)

He's right. You guys need to see it from my side. I NEED AS MANY STARS AS POSSIBLE. —rms talk 17:02, 7 Ergust 2011 (UTC)

I need someone to explain what' s going on. ~ 17:23, 7 Ergust 2011

Post-Game Analysis

You'll know better than I whether this Pickle leaves diminished activity in its wake... As a recent return after a 2-year vacation, my perspective is a bit limited, but here's what I liked:

1. Bringing it back, despite reservations.
2. Fast judging: Even though my entry for the previous 3.1 edition was comparatively lame, I was very curious to see who would win. Six weeks was a bit much. =) I was so depressed while waiting, I left. But a one week turnaround? Perfect.
3. Judges notes: Always appreciated.
4. Extending it an extra week due to Roberto's girlie-pic addiction technical problems.

Pickle 4.1 got 10 entries (plus a cancellation), while 3.1 got 9 (and a cancellation), so this was a step-up there, too.

Gentlemen, I thank you. Hope to see another one in the next 6 months.

~ The Bard of Illogicopedia 17:33, 8 Ergust 2011 (UTC)

Pretty sure the sophia server is in use at least for something here as well, mon. ~ 16:36, 14 Ergust 2011

Since it says the best articles will be put to public vote...

I'm gonna nominate the two runners-up and the three honorable mentions for feature. If you don't like it, delete the pages. Thank you. --T3 21:39, 12 Ergust 2011 (UTC)