Forum:The why or why not

From Illogicopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The big one. The question that is. There's the possibility of an ansew. That's what you get the next time, before any answer.

Answe the really bad substitute question or not. But don't stop bye.

We – after a readership exist – know something of a miss. A single event in the foremost important evil work of msipeeling. There's no contraction. Quit universally, your time too. Quickly see the sad shape of it all. Truly not in-between the two, you really don't, grow a nice new sense instead and perceive the way around the bent challenge ahead of you and me. The path has a fnurdle in it. --Fluffalizer 19:40, 10 Farbleum 2021 (UTC)

Oh dear. If you could want to have to do anything, then garbage compactors a way then have our many things. Or stuff. I'm not quite sure, though. CG098 (talk ☼‎ contribs) 03:10, 11 Farbleum 2021 (UTC)

The path is here. How to exhale the spirit of a cult after inhaling it years ago, so that it will gracefully grace the pages?

I saw it coming, the garbage-can approach, so I am wary of some types of garbage-handling suggestions.

As a different problem, I suggest a word list from meep to moo, a word list which cannot pass muster. --Fluffalizer 14:12, 18 Farbleum 2021 (UTC)

Meep! CG098 (talk ☼‎ contribs) 18:37, 18 Farbleum 2021 (UTC)
Mellowly, I changed my mind and dug something out of the titular trash. --Fluffalizer 17:45, 19 Farbleum 2021 (UTC)
Yes! Another dumpster diver survivalist like me! CG098 (talk ☼‎ contribs) 21:39, 19 Farbleum 2021 (UTC)

Meep, mellowly? Memories... Memories of Francis E. Dec come to mind, but Dec is but a pale shadow compared to this person, whose order transcends such chaos and yet reflects a greater madness. I have been working on expanding that RW article, and to the extent of reworking it, have made the shades of surreal humor emerge more clearly. But there's something more emerging more visibly, something... menacing. In response to which, maybe a mad laugh is the best medicine? Direct exposure to the stuff described may, in many cases, be ill-advised, but a distillation may possibly lead to new ideas, much like descriptions of Dec did. But in this case, I suggest the topics other than the person, and ideas similar to those, to be the center of humor. --Fluffalizer 01:30, 22 Arply 2021 (UTC)

Hmm. Interesting. More coherent in style, yet more sophisticated in its kookery. I kind of like it. There's definitely salvagable content, although I fear the humor (or should I say, humour) is too subtle to rival Dec. CG098 (talk ☼‎ contribs) 03:51, 22 Arply 2021 (UTC)
I think some quotes can rival Dec, but looking at the whole, the humo(u)r is diluted in a very large mass of text produced over decades. Not worth reading much of for most people. But concentrated distillations with the most surreal parts put on display may be fun enough. In addition to the main article, maybe later, some short theme compilation more for fun can be added... (There's a "Fun" namespace on RW which contains some absurd humor. And an updated article on Illogicopedia.) --Fluffalizer 14:20, 22 Arply 2021 (UTC)

Missed nothing, did I? I've recovered from intense bogon bombardment, and now I'm sane enough to, ehh, say this! This!

No, not this, that. And that article has grown. Something has gone oddly sexual about the worst kookery, in a disturbing way, not very good for click bait. It supposedly all began over 300 000 years ago, or so, when human history and existence became what we know instead of something totally different, in a way analogous to The Matrix. If you ever get excited in response to anything at all, keep in mind that invisible perverted and constantly watching and mind-meddling reptilian life-suckers are definitely there, or so Mother Brain, no, I mean the other evil super sci-fi mind pretending to be good, claims. But this is too simple to discuss, do you have anything else to suggest?

Also, why have Illogicopedia and Uncyclopedia.co been so slow lately? --Fluffalizer 21:16, 29 Serpeniver 2021 (UTC)

No one messes with the Royal Australian Air Force! CG098 (talk ☼‎ contribs) 01:02, 1 Octodest 2021 (UTC)
Or so they say, who knows how many reports of flying emus and their doings have been covered up? (Flying? Yes, they covertly developed their own technology. That's the real story of how they won the Emu War, as opposed to the falsified official history. Even less known is the cold war which followed, and really never ended.) --Fluffalizer 00:23, 3 Octodest 2021 (UTC)
That comment aged well.... CG098 (talk ☼‎ contribs) 14:59, 25 Arche 2022 (UTC)