Illogicopedia:Review/Old Man River
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- See here for the review index.
Old Man River[edit | edit source]
Well, it's a short article, yes, and really doesn't deserve a review, but I'd like to see how I'm going with these kind of articles, or if I should abandon this style for another. (On an unrealated note, for some reason I'm listening to Old Man River now.) KGT 23:47, 23 Aym 2008 (UTC)
| Concept: | 6 | Not really an amazing concept |
| Execution: | 6 | Didn't really have any substance to it, randome though |
| Grammar and Formatting: | 8 | Nothing wrong here |
| Images: | 0 | No images |
| Miscellany: | 6 | ? |
| Final Score: | 26 | not an amzing article, kinda randumb page filler. What did you mean by the style ytou're using may I ask? |
| Reviewer: | 18:03, 1 Yoon 2008 (UTC) | |
Well, that's good, I didn't really want it to be too amazing. Also, style, meaning the length, subject, randomness etc.
The reason I wanted this reviewed is basically to see how good it is in terms of a normal (average/short length) article, just to clarify. --KGT 08:59, 2 Yoon 2008 (UTC)