Waaa

Waaa is a philosopher. He has many different views on the universe. Here are a few:

Waa on Illogic

I am not sure, or even not sure that I can be not sure, or whether the status of being not sure applies to those in such status, thus casing a paradox that also denies unsure-ness simultaneously, using multitasking impossible in such situations of great philosophical density, whether the sole and only cause of such theoretical knowledge can exist in such entropic states - logic states that this would not happen, or it is that which such entropy logic does not apply? It could be, theoretically, because the paradoxical nature of the term and definition of "theoretically" mean that it could, although I again using logic, which could offset the infinity of my definition, although I am sure that I am sure that I can combat this simply by stating the fact - if logic states that logic cannot exist, what is logic to define such matters? However, this brief description still does not equal that of the stability of the concept itself, so I shall use a simple analogy to explain my method of stabilizing the definition:

If  a cat wishes to be eaten by a dog, it would ask, however if the dog was hungry, it would accept, unless the cat was the last female cat capable of
reproduction. If only the cat knew whether it was the last female capable of reproduction, assuming the dog's only food source are cats, would the dog
eat the cat?

I can break this analogy down for you... To prove whether the dog is the dog is to simultaneously disproves the dog's state of not being the dog, or a dog, depending on whether the dog knows that it is known about. If we express the dog as D, and anything that is not the dog as not(D), then everything can be described as D + not(D). This is a simplified example, including the cat and other potential cats, we must include the Potential Result Mapping Theorem, giving a result which cannot be expressed in either the third- or seventh- dimensions.

To give an idea of the complexity of zero-state algorithms as above described, it is worth imagining a seventeen sided dice, with a 4.53-sided dice embedded into each face of the first die, so each may be rolled and intrinsically associated with a face. Now, roll that die onto a slowly rotating L-dimensional hyper-cube, where the relative speed of the rotation is equal to the reciprocal of the value of the side of the 17-sided dice which is closest to 90 degrees of asymptotic systematic asymmetry in the L-17 axis.

The net result (in Information Plane One) of a demonstrative (that is, bounded and finite) representation of a zero-state algorithm, Z, can be defined as the combinatoric derivation of the set of the outwards faces of the 4.53-sided dice in each of the sides of the 17-sided dice, where L is defined as P+Q(q+p(*), where P and p are the upper and lower end points of the Steinberg-Hoffler Composite Map for the root {L,-L,4.53,17,0,Y} (where Y is the null set of L and -L). Q and q are similar, except using Freinichstoff theory to compile the root, and the root is in base R, R of course is the Godel number of the sub-root of itself. The asterix denotes the reciprocating method of all statistic manifold series.

From this application of Complex Illogic Theory is needed to derive a result positive- or negative-state algorithm, emerging in a NEV or NNV, depending on the states' negativity value. So it is clearly to see that proving the dogs existence in itself requires multiple poly-static algorithmic equations, with the net result depending on relative dimension, not including transdimensional-divergence errors.