Illogicopedia:Review/Letter of Condolance
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- See here for the review index.
Letter of Condolance[edit | edit source]
I wrote this artilce. Score is out of fourty, because there are no pictures. Enjoy. —rms talk 18:01, 21 Yoon 2009 (UTC)
| Concept: | 9 | What can I say, the concept itself leaves it open for much tomffolery. |
| Execution: | 7.5 | It was good, don't get me wrong, but it could have been a bit better. That's what a review is for right? To tell you shizzle like this. Maybe provide an overtone where it progressively gets more anti-the recipient, because that's how itself up when I read it, you just railroaded on to the out and out plot you chose quite quickly. Feel free to ignore this, but I'd have made the turn around of apologeticness to it's your fault! a bit more gradual, maybe ending in you sueing them for damaging your bumper. Just a thought. But other than that it read well, the reply was quite good, nothing really to say there, unless you could think an even more alternative to cat. Whatever, this section's dragged on long enough. |
| Grammar and Formatting: | 10 | I don't know if it was you who started off the letter formatting (i.e. this and the mint upgrade you did to Dearest Blog) but it most definately works. If the signature could be made see through and moved on to the page a bit then it'd be 11, but I'm not complaining. A solid 10 here. |
| Images: | {{{Iscore}}} | |
| Miscellany: | 8 | 8 sounds about right. I got rid of the image box because it really didn't apply here, well done Readmesoon. |
| Final Score: | 34.5 | Time for some good ol' Dundee cake. |
| Reviewer: | 09:35, 16 Jumbly 2009 (UTC) | |