Talk:Alan Greenspan

I removed the stub template

Because this article is a piece of fucking art. I normally just move along when I see a stub template I don't agree with (which has happened a lot because of a certain user I won't name), but I could not stand for this. Just because it doesn't have a long dissertation does not mean that this article is not quality. It is absolutely amazing, and I want to enter into a monogamous relationship with I forgot because of it. --T3 02:24, 21 Jumbly 2014 (UTC)

Your action is completely justified — another one of Kate's habits when she was around was adding heaps of stub templates to short articles even when it wasn't necessarily... necessary. ~ Good tidings! ~ 03:42, 21 Jumbly 2014 (UTC)

I'm glad. I think I'll go through the stubs to see which ones should stay or go. --T3 06:06, 21 Jumbly 2014 (UTC)

And, just so the world knows, I'm putting the burden on the article instead of the stub template. Meaning that the article will have to prove unworthy of the stub template, not the other way around. Okay. --T3 06:07, 21 Jumbly 2014 (UTC)

So I took the template off of 42 articles and expanded 11 (and entirely rewrote 1), so I'd say that was a good night of ?Pediaing. --T3 08:40, 21 Jumbly 2014 (UTC)

Quite a fine endeavour indeed. With the way you've been making things at the moment you might even stumble across a third banana. ~ Good tidings! ~ 14:22, 21 Jumbly 2014 (UTC)

That means a lot, Miss Decks, but as my father used to tell me, "Once you get to three bananas, you might just be gay." --T3 21:20, 21 Jumbly 2014 (UTC)