Talk:George Hamburg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This[edit source]
Reverting an edit is seven years' bad luck, or maybe just a frozen broccoli-wielding shoggoth, but I would still like to consider the remote possibility of attempting to consider thinking about the possibility of trying to say that the above edit removed a good deal of text that may indeed not belong there at all, but that I thought to have some inkling of redeeming value. Does anyone envision the idea of considering to agree? Or are the flying tentacle cans after us again? ❦ Flyingcat (meow?) 02:50, 7 Jumbly 2014 (UTC)
- Honestly, my revert was probably too much of a knee-jerk reaction. It's just that the article of George Hamburg has always been kind of special to Illogicopedia despite never being featured. I know that the edit did add a good bit of text, but the story of George Hamburg and the consequential poems are almost like a mythology on Illogicopedia, at least as I remember, and I thought it best to keep the mythology to what it has been for almost seven years. Still, this is a wiki, and that IP has every right to add all of that text, so once again, I probably made an error. I honestly think it would be best for Fonchezzz to weigh in. --T3 02:58, 7 Jumbly 2014 (UTC)
- I wouldn't know anything, of course, though definitely it would be good if Fonchezzz could add his two and a half cents. However, that IP would be Gruntled, by all evidence. That may or may not have swayed my opinion and it may or may not sway yours. ❦ Flyingcat (meow?) 03:44, 7 Jumbly 2014 (UTC)
- That definitely changes things, but I would still err on the side of keeping the article as-is, but it's not my call, so it really doesn't matter. --T3 03:53, 7 Jumbly 2014 (UTC)
- I wouldn't know anything, of course, though definitely it would be good if Fonchezzz could add his two and a half cents. However, that IP would be Gruntled, by all evidence. That may or may not have swayed my opinion and it may or may not sway yours. ❦ Flyingcat (meow?) 03:44, 7 Jumbly 2014 (UTC)