Forum:EPICS (I know I'm gonna get flamed but here I go...)

<<< Back to Logical Sector • <<< Back to Forum

This part of the discussion is a pointless flamewar and should be ignored.

If You Are Ben Blade or anyone who likes to put my ideas down on a regular basis, don't read Even though I am not an admin yet I believe a slight change is in order. EPICS should not be a long story. They should be long anything. Just an article that takes an interminable length of time to read. Take Queen or A Very Randumb Article or even my own article, Are you Freaking Kidding Me?. That's my proposition. Don't leave a dumb and putting-down-esqe message about tradition and all that stuff because frankly I don't care. Just say yes or no. This has been First Cadet T. Three Canolis, with your daily opportunity to say "no" to something. Also, PLEASE agree. --T3 04:55, 25 Yoon 2009 (UTC) Well, this is odd. Ive just woke this morning and won a spoof pickle, and then read a forum stereotyping me as some type of cynic :D. Also, that idea is dogshitBen Blade 06:15, 25 Yoon 2009 (UTC) T3, no, simply put. That's be a pretty terrible idea bec ause then someone banging out random gibberish on clock mechanics would be an epic. An epic is an epic because it's an epic. You can tell what an epic is, the story thing is the epicness. Simply put, this isn't one of your greatest ideas. Testostereich • (ballsack) As well as that, the idea was to keep epics exclusive, otherwise the template, if we did what you're proposing would become essentially meaningless. :P Just because you want more epics 194.80.20.10 09:47, 25 Yoon 2009 (UTC) Clock mechanics, eh? Hmm... -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 11:48, 25 Yoon 2009 (UTC) Like, totally lemon biscuits man. --Silent PenguinLeave Me Alone 14:17, 25 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

When I said dogshit I didnt actually mean it, gauise. In fact I never actually read that goddamn thing. heheh--Ben ^Blade 15:50, 25 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

Why did I even write this? I KNEW this was going to happen. And Ben, what did I tell you about not reading it. --T3 18:22, 25 Yoon 2009 (UTC)