Talk:Spelling

We need more content, RMS. --T3 19:52, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

Agreed. Let me blaze through ther for a bit. —rms talk 19:53, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

I added an image. --T3 19:58, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

I wrote some more content, I plan ondoing even more, but I'm writing correctly. I'm counting on you to go i and screw it up. —rms talk 20:05, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

You didn't spell everything wrong! --T3 20:05, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

Like I said, i'm countig on you to do the dirty work. I hope you don't mind, it would just take too much time for me to think about writing that all wrong. —rms talk 20:08, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

No worries. I enjoy coming up with stoopid ways for people to say things. --T3 20:16, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

I changed the positioning of and removed some quotes. Hope you like it. —rms talk 20:24, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

I added some of the essential quotes and moved some to a better position. --T3 20:33, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

I moved grammar up and added more to it. —rms talk 20:39, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

I misspelled everything on grammer. --T3 20:55, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

Sweet. I've got to go for, uh, maybe ten, twenty minutes. —rms talk 20:58, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

Okay. When you get back tell me if it's ready for review. --T3 21:08, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

We're definitely going to need more for speeling bees. Also, we'll need another section about... hm... maybe somone who invented spelling? Like the w's (Who what where Wax Etc.) of that. —rms talk 21:12, 10 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

I added a section about Phonics and finished the spelling bees. --T3 01:15, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

Good. I'll add to phonics, and then I'll add a section about the history at the beginning. —rms talk 01:19, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

I misspelled all of the creation section. --T3 02:14, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

I wrote this comment down. —rms talk 02:18, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

Good for you. --T3 02:19, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

I trhink we need to ditch one of the conversations in the alphabet section. —rms talk 02:21, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

I'm gonna delete the part after the "alphabet soup out your ass" because that part's the least funneh. --T3 02:24, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

Ya, probably. —rms talk 02:25, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

It's done. I have to say, the alphabet soup line is by far the funniest thing in the article. --T3 02:27, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

You can add more to the phonics section then I'll clean mess it up. --T3 02:28, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

Personally, I thought the part where the teacher was like "You guys are so fucking stupid!" and the lines following were the best. Like how she was going to kkill herself. —rms talk 02:29, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

Yeah. Haha. --T3 03:03, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

I added more to the "Fonniks" section. Tell me if it needs more. Wait. It's only 9:00am where you are. Well, when you get up (I just did and it's 12:34) tell me if it needs more. --T3 16:36, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

DUde. I added a on Phonics, but what we need to do is rearrange the section. Before you go in and misspell, let me rearrange it, ok? —rms talk 16:41, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

Yeah. --T3 16:42, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

I'm done. —rms talk 16:52, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

C'mon. The gang banger line was great. Can I PLEEZE keep it? --T3 16:53, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

If you can somehow find a way to keep it with the concept of kids becoming addicted, yes. —rms talk 16:55, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

I made it have to do with schools that don't have phonics. I misspelled everything by the way. --T3 17:44, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

An insane aamount of applause goes to you for this, but

...fucking hell reading that made me want to blow my brains out, don't ask me how I read all of it. I nearly cried. --Testostereich • (ballsack) 17:43, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

...and it's not finished. By the way, I did all of the misspelling. You're welcome. And by the way, why did you read it? I wrote the freaking thing and I wouldn't put myself through that kind of torture. --T3 17:45, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

....because I'm a ..... good ....admin. It was toture, but it's over now so it's all good, :D --Testostereich • (ballsack) 17:46, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

I was taking your advice from how to get an article featured. This article will be so hard to read, people willb blow it off and give it an auto-for. —rms talk 17:48, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

You think about feature too much, but hey, always glad to meet a fan. *signs RMS's face* --Testostereich • (ballsack) 17:50, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

Augh! My eye! It has sharpie! —rms talk 17:52, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

Just thought i'd mention it

You two have recently come along these past weeks/months, I don't know about time, I'm not a watch. But yeah, good work, you're generally good and funny and stuff, so hot piss i guess. --Testostereich • (ballsack) 18:47, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

Well, thanks alot. All of my most recent articles have been good lengths and quality I think. Also, note how this talkpage has more view than the regular page. —rms talk 18:57, 11 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

I think it's because when I was a newer user, I would write anything that popped in my head so I ended up with like 50 sub-par articles but now I take my best ideas and develop them into gold. --T3 00:54, 12 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

I take any idea and turn it into gold. —rms talk 01:15, 12 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

VANITY!

I highlighted this article and I did see a message informing of who wrote this? O_O --Galanoth 22:49, 23 Yoon 2009 (UTC)

Yes you did. And that's not vanity, either. It's just stating who wrote the article in a hidden way. Nothing wrong with that. --T3 23:00, 23 Yoon 2009 (UTC)