Vandalism on Wheels on Wheels on WHEELS!!!!!!!!!

Seen here is a highly sucky and quite rare photo of Sophia untouched by vand...damn it...not again.

“In Soviet Russia, Wikipedia vandalises YOU!”

~ Russian reversal on vandalism

“<insert name here> is french toast”

~ 127.0.0.1

I love messing up wiki sites is any unaddition, deletion, or change to content made in a deliberate attempt to reduce the quality of the encyclopedia. The most common typa cheesee of vandalism is the replacement of existing text with obscenities, page blanking, or the insertion of meta-jokes or other nonsense. Fortunately, this kind of vandalism is usually easy to spot.

^{my cats name is penny because shes shiny}

Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not YOUR MUM. Apparent bad-faith edits that do not make their bad-faith nature inarguably explicit are not considered vandalism at Wikipedia can i realy edit this page wow. For example, adding an opinion once is not vandalism — it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated. no thats nottrue at all you stupid, this arcitle is full of wrong facts, wikipedia is the worst

Committing vandalism is a violation of the Wikipedia policy; it needs to be spotted, and then dealt harshly with — sucky suckup users are encouraged to report and revert any vandalism they see.eifejkd

just testing

Willy on Wheels

Wiki Vandalismlink title

Your mother

Wiki vandalism is generally defined as editing your caterer in a way that is intentionally disghhptive or destructive. There are four generally acknowledged types of vandalism: deletion of legitimate information, insertion of noncents or irrelevant content, addition of unwanted commercial links (spam), and policy violations specific to that wiki. engyuoioish people vandalised our sheep

Spotting Vandalism

seriously who doesnt no how too spot vandallism on wheels

• you spelt it wrong its "vanDULLism" gosh golly gee buddy ya gotta get this

I know it when I see it, doebgbhjkihum9oimunyujnsisted of really quite obvious cases. NO IT ISNT Hence, Wikipedia doesn't need to definefoo an "official" policy on what constitutes vandalism at all.yes itdoes We can use the rule of thumb, "When a reasonable person might be in doubt as to whether something is vandalism, it would be polite not to call it vandalism."cowbell

Of course, that depends on the normative definitions of "obvious", "reasonable" and "polite"NO!!!!!!!!, which are necessarily subjective, and vary from encyclopedia to uncyclopedia.

Patent vandalism is vandalism where both the reader and the contributor agree that it is vandalism. This is sometimes easy to determine (e.g. vandal puts HAHAHAHAH as their edit summary or otherwise states that it is vandalism), and sometimes slightly harder. I Know!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! '''Italic text[

http://www.example.com link title

] Italic text[

http://www.example.com link title

yuoile:Example.ogg]] == [Headline text]'''''' == ]]

Vandalism, Otherwise

sssssssmice eeeeEeE[yu[[dsgggggg[ee]]]rtryu4]eeevdybg jhkljksopjkyjorioj,;b,;dflho5t46465657578y0490y.;

Vandalism is the avdigjirjy9foo5iuy5plu[5;u5]'f]blchhuyhjmui

“When in Rome, do as the Vandals do.”

~ Napoleon Bonaparte on Napoleon

See also

• you suckyuhyungyuigyuingyi

i sucks you sucks we uneducated chavs

Wikia Sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!