Forum:Uncyc flood

<<< Back to Illogical Zone • <<< Back to Forum

What's goin' on? There's dozens of articles flying in from Uncyc and eating our cheese. --(ƒî)» 07:15, 23 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)

Kill. That's all I have to say. —rms talk 22:40, 23 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)

Are people really that lazy? They want copy articles from Uncyclopedia? This is a practice that should be banned! or extremely limited--ColbertNation 21:08, 29 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)

I say we just blow up Uncyclopedia altogether. Who's with me? —rms talk 21:25, 29 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)

Aye! The days of their dull and stupid "humor" (or "humour", if you prefer) shall reach an end!--ColbertNation 21:34, 29 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)

Exactly! Now ?pedia's pathetic attempts at humour and nonsense (which is really just shit in the form of coded 1's and 0's) will reign in power! —rms talk 21:44, 29 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)

I couldn't agree with you more. Those "Humor experts" cannot match our nonsensical ability!--ColbertNation 21:47, 29 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)

..which is essentially all humour/humor leads to cheese. Hmm am I right? --RomArtus*Imperator (Orate) 12:04, 30 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)

Well, not exactly. First off, I wouldn't call any of it humour. I would call it "acquired comical value", and the only people who find it "funny" are us ?pedia users whose brains have turned into mush over the years. Some stuff may actually be funny to the population, say Universe (one of my personal favorites), whereas others are are just lame things that us ?pedians find funny. And, secondly, only old articles from 2007 really revolved around cheese. Nowadays It seems like cocks. —rms talk 15:44, 30 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)

Hmmm. That is a lot to ponder. I quite enjoy the "lame" stuff here, anyway. Oh well, I guess the population just might not appreciate true "humor", "aquired comical value" etc. Sad for them!--ColbertNation 15:57, 30 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)

You must have some brain disease or something, that explains why you enjoy this site. At first I didn't like it all, but my brain decayed at a remarkable rate so now I like the stuff. —rms talk 16:42, 30 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)

Either that, or my brain decayed at a much faster rate. Not sure on that one. I've enjoyed the site since my first little baby article. Brain decay rocks!--ColbertNation 16:51, 30 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)

Three cheers for rotten brain flesh, random babblings, and overused jokes! also stealing Tesostereich's articles and making cheap ripoffs —rms talk 16:57, 30 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)

DUCK DUCK HOORAY! DUCK DUCK HOORAY! DUCK DUCK HOORAY!--ColbertNation 16:59, 30 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)

The difference between us and Uncle Pete is that we know we aren't funny. :P -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 17:03, 30 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)

Sometimes we have the funny, more than uncle pete anyway, pissing in the bath is his game.--Silent PenguinLeave Me Alone 13:34, 31 Jumbly 2010 (UTC)

Hello, ?pedians. Look at uncyc, now back to ?pedia, now back at uncyc, now back to ?pedia. Sadly, uncyc isn’t ?pedia, but if it stopped using sarcasm and switched to nonsense, it could smell like it's ?pedia. Look down, back up, where are you? You’re on a toilet duck with the wiki your wiki could smell like. What’s in your hand, back at me. I have it, it’s an oyster with two Chocolate coins to that thing you love. Look again, the coins are now diamonds. Anything is possible when your wiki smells like nonsense and not your uncle Pete. I’m on a Space Penguin. --(ƒî)» 04:45, 1 Ergust 2010 (UTC)

shit, fi's back and he's loaded with old spice commercials (which are pretty awesome anyway) don't get to spammy now —rms talk 04:47, 1 Ergust 2010 (UTC)

There has never been a better Internet meme for comparing two things. Probably never will. --(ƒî)» 04:53, 1 Ergust 2010 (UTC)

I think people should be able to bring articles they wrote from Uncle Pete. That's what I did when the site first got started is I migrated alot of stuff I wrote that was more nonsensical than funny. Just cause the person typed it in over there doesn't mean it doesn't belong here. Forking is just part of what wikis do. --Nerd42 16:17, 3 Ergust 2010 (UTC)

This person was indiscriminately mass copying stuff across, though. I wouldn't have bothered to raise an eyebrow, but one of them was mine. -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 17:51, 3 Ergust 2010 (UTC)

Oh that's different. --Nerd42 18:06, 3 Ergust 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I have no problem with people copying across their own stuff or the odd article that's being deleted. Not sure why we would need duplicate copies of certain articles that still exist at Uncle Pete though, I'm against that as a rule. -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 19:34, 3 Ergust 2010 (UTC)

What's this Uncle Pete business anyway? Hmmm.. Anyway, I see you don't do drama (may be not recently) . Perhaps the kitchen in here is full of plastic cutlery, that could be the reason. --RomArtus*Imperator (Orate) 11:51, 4 Ergust 2010 (UTC)

Unclepeteopedia? Ah yes, one of those stupid Illogicopedia in-jokes that seems to have stuck. -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 12:10, 4 Ergust 2010 (UTC)