Forum:Voting Idea

From Illogicopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I have created a voting template that combines comments and votes into one simple thing:

Template:Vote

Should such a system be added to the VFH_vote template?

Vote below, lol

Template:Vote


I think we should incorporate the uncyc voting scheme, but to fit the illogical idea, change the colours round so 'x' is green and vice versa--Ben Blade 20:58, 18 Octodest 2009 (UTC)
Anonymous wonders why any kindof fix is needed really, unless you can sort out the redirect problem, cus that'd be schweet, but yeah, other than that the comment one was tidy. 92.11.167.216 22:03, 18 Octodest 2009 (UTC)
Red x.svg:kinda pointless, but mainly the icons are fugly and probably stolen
--Silent Penguin 23:32, 18 Octodest 2009 (UTC)
The X is stolen, how did u no? But perhaps the penguin that does not make a sound is correct, changing it may be 'kinda pointless', or not. Also, redirect problem, what redirect problem? --(ƒî)» 03:14, 19 Octodest 2009 (UTC)
Doesn't matter, they're in the public domain, I do believe. If you start saying people are 'stealing' public domain content then it's like saying I stole all of those old Victorian peep show showreels... which I didn't. Cough. Oh, and I don't really like this template, it's all big and bulky. No offense to the creator. -- Hindleyak  Converse?blogClick here! 12:27, 19 Octodest 2009 (UTC)
Details, Mr. Hindleyite, minor details, such things are easily changed. --(ƒî)» 12:52, 19 Octodest 2009 (UTC)
So this, you are suggesting, is only the beta stage of said template? I am intrigued. -- Hindleyak  Converse?blogClick here! 13:08, 19 Octodest 2009 (UTC)
It's done, but you say you wish it to be smaller, so be it.

link={{{link}}} Does this suit your size requirements? --(ƒî)» 17:09, 19 Octodest 2009 (UTC)

'Tis indeed better, but I'm sorry to break it to you... I like the old template too much to change to a new one. -- Hindleyak  Converse?blogClick here! 11:19, 20 Octodest 2009 (UTC)

Words of wisdom from yours truly[edit source]

meh —rms talk 04:44, 19 Octodest 2009 (UTC)