| Score: 0 (3-3)
|
Nomination by Gomphog 23:53, 23 Ditzimber 2010 (UTC)
|
| For:
|
- For. Bob has spoken. --Gomphog 10:43, 24 Ditzimber 2010 (UTC)
- For. Gomphog. Bob. How can I not vote yes on this? It's Gomphog and Bob! Aleister 21:30 2 1
For. This article is almost orgasmic. --4skin 11:56, 15 Jeremy 2011 (UTC)
- Sockpuppet vote. ~
 16:06, 15 Jeremy 2011
- For Bob-bob-bob-bob-bobobobobob. Because its all chaotical and everything. simsilikesims 20:33, 24 Farbleum 2011 (UTC)
|
| Against:
|
- Its nice in parts, but its way too unfocused and úber-long Testostereich • (ballsack) 13:27, 13 Jeremy 2011 (UTC)
- Against. Too long and uninteresting, much like my long articles.--Colonel Sanders/Colonel Battaleaxe 20:15, 15 Jeremy 2011 (UTC)
- Against Because of whatever I said in those two reviews I did on it back an Uncy.--
 (Talk) (Contributions) 07:02, 27 Jeremy 2011 (UTC)
|
| Comments:
|
- That's just too long... O_o ~ 22:29, 24 Ditzimber
- You know, instead of sockpuppetteering, you could address the main concern of the abstgauinsters and shorten it a mite. Say, remove that listy sig... It'd fit perhaps better on The Longest Article, you know. ~ 16:06, 15 Jeremy 2011
|
