Illogicopedia:Votes for Feature

From Illogicopedia
(Redirected from Illogicopedia:VFH)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This is for articles; see also: Illogicopedia:Featured images
Sencible stamp.png
  This section is Logical; it is meant to be. Prepare to be bored.  
  Sensible Section  


This page displays all of the current votes. See Forum:Department of Limelight for a summary index of nominated articles and the other non-article-vote-related things handled there.

Previous article nominations can be found here - or separately, the featured, the ones waiting to be featured and the ones that failed. This category tree also contains all nominated pages and their votes. (useful for checking that the VFF template has been added/removed correctly)

For how to feature or fail an article, see here.

Nomination

Enter the full name of the article below (make sure to use proper capitalization) and click "Nominate", then follow the instructions on the next page to create the entry. If the page already exists, you can either try to fix the "Revoting" option or give up.


Revolting

If you think a previously failed nomination has a chance at winning a revote, you can re-nominate it below. (note that repeated renomination of a page without good reason is frowned upon – a review of the article is recommended) Once again, enter the full name of the article below (make sure to use proper capitalization) and click "Revote", then follow the instructions on the next page to create the entry.


Current votes

VOTING REGULATIONS
There is voting currently taking place below this template, So here are the voting basics:
  • Users are permitted one vote each.
  • Please clearly state whether your addition is a for, an against or a comment.
  • Remember to sign and to update the vote count.
  • Nominations count as a vote for unless specified as "Neutral" or "Against".
  • Take care not to overdo self-nomination.
  • If you wish to change your vote, then cross out the previous using the <s> tags.
  • Frog-infested pineapples are not allowed in the voting area until they have been de-frogged.
Click here for more details





UR MOM (vote)

Score: 0 (1-1) Nomination by 162.233.177.60 17:17, 3 Arche 2021 (UTC)
For:
Against:
Comments:


Satan Explained (vote)

Score: 1 (1-0) Nomination by CG098 (talk ☼‎ contribs) 20:40, 13 Jeremy 2021 (UTC)
For:
  • Nom and for One of the highest quality recent (in geologic terms, for the internet, that is) articles. Good length, and good compression of a large amounts of illogics into that length. Very deserving and such. CG098 (talk ☼‎ contribs) 20:40, 13 Jeremy 2021 (UTC)
  • For pretty good bsod user (bsod talk) 12:15, 30 Arply 2021 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:


Good electricity and bad electricity (vote)

Score: 2.5 (2.5-0) Nomination by LAR Adriator-Gruntled.png(kaizum me)Plant2.png 15:40, 4 Jeremy 2016 (UTC)
For:
  • For - A dazzling surreal dip into the story of elextrikity. LAR Adriator-Gruntled.png(kaizum me)Plant2.png 15:40, 4 Jeremy 2016 (UTC)
  • Decent enough.  Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 04:03, 8 Jumbly 2018 (UTC)
  • Half-For: i'm not sure why but this one vibes with me. something feels off though :: Felis Lupis (talk) 19:53, 28 Arply 2021 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:


Avril Lavigne Reference Desk (vote)

Score: 2 (2-0) Nomination by Icons-flag-au.png Operator XY - (Conversal :: Editations - Special:Editcount/XY007 and counting!) 01:00, 6 Arche 2016 (UTC)
For:

Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri I quite like this article. Though it'd be best served renaming it to Avril Lavigne and Summer Glau Reference Desk. This ends the pre-recorded message by Icons-flag-au.png Operator XY - (Conversal :: Editations - Special:Editcount/XY007 and counting!) 01:00, 6 Arche 2016 (UTC)

Against:
Comments:
  • This seems to be a parody of Wikipedia's reference desk. I'm not enough into pop culture to really appreciate this, I shouldn't think.  Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 00:15, 18 Yoon 2018 (UTC)


Less than three (vote)

Score: 1 (2-1) Nomination by Icons-flag-au.png Operator XY - (Conversal :: Editations - Special:Editcount/XY007 and counting!) 22:18, 26 Arche 2017 (UTC)
For:
Against:
  • Clever but doesn't catch my interest enough.  Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 18:21, 10 Arche 2019 (UTC)
Comments:
  • I found it to be meh. It's OK, but I don't see a compelling reason to feature it. Convince me to vote one way or the other. LAR Adriator-Gruntled.png(kaizum me)Plant2.png 03:50, 27 Arche 2017 (UTC)
  • I just like it because it has a crescendo, and then shatters your expectations completely. Sort of like climbing a building, only to find that the observation deck has no floor. Icons-flag-au.png Operator XY - (Conversal :: Editations - Special:Editcount/XY007 and counting!) 04:00, 27 Arche 2017 (UTC)


Jedi (vote)

Score: 2 (3-1) Nomination by Fiery Meme (talk) 14:11, 21 Ditzimber 2017 (UTC)
For:
  • JEDI That's my reason. Fiery Meme (talk) 14:11, 21 Ditzimber 2017 (UTC)
  • Next to Jebus 5 votes and this thing gets featured. It's actually not half bad. XY007 (talk - contribs - business) 02:47, 29 Aym 2018 (UTC)
  • For Just because. simsilikesims (talk) 18:37, 10 Novelniver 2018 (UTC)
Against:
  • It lacks a certain something. The women's outfits are certainly illogical, but that's something else again...  Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 20:32, 7 Novelniver 2018 (UTC)
Comments:


Not so Fairy Tales (vote)

Score: 1.5 (2.5-1) Nomination by Fiery Meme (talk) 02:01, 22 Farbleum 2018 (UTC)
For:
  • Yes. Because this article exists. I need no other reason
    --The previous unsigned comment was left by Fiery Meme (talk), see the past frenzies page for posting time
  • Miniature-for It's a solid article, but it could do with a picture or two. XY007 (talk - contribs - business) 04:23, 22 Farbleum 2018 (UTC)
  • For. How many?
    --The previous unsigned comment was left by Sophia (talk), see the past frenzies page for posting time
Against:
  • On rereading this, I'd rather not. It gets off to a good start, but a lot of it seems to consist of a poop joke. I might add images later.  Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 18:50, 10 Arche 2019 (UTC)
Comments:
  • Sitting on the fence. It's pointy. I edited it a bit. The article, not the fence. How do you edit a fence?  Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 18:34, 8 Jumbly 2018 (UTC)


anti-murders (vote)

Score: 0 (1-1) Nomination by A random specific guy (talk) 19:38, 22 Aym 2019 (UTC)
For:
Against:
Comments:


Battle for Terraria (vote)

Score: 0 (0-0) Nomination by 69.58.53.6 18:12, 6 Farbleum 2020 (UTC)
For:
Against:
Comments:


Idk (vote)

Score: 0 (1-1) Nomination by 49.245.121.193 15:24, 8 Arche 2020 (UTC)
For:
Against:
Comments:


The Stranger (vote)

Score: 2 (2-0) Nomination by Nothinggetspastyou (talk) 06:59, 17 Ditzimber 2018 (UTC)
For:
  • self nom & for sure why not
  • That's some white men all right.  Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 02:51, 2 Jeremy 2019 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:


magnetic trousers (vote)

{{VFH_vote.table|nominator=Japanese Cat (talk) 19:49, 18 Ditzimber 2018 (UTC) |for_count=1 |for=

  • For. I kind of like this article. It's simple, elegant, and plenty illogical. Kow Tow to Mao (talk) 18:41, 5 Farbleum 2019 (UTC)

|against_count=1 |against=

|comments=*I think this user should make a comment why s/he has nominated it.--The Pioneer (A.K.A. かいたくしゃ) 09:15, 19 Ditzimber 2018 (UTC)

|Illogicopedia:VFH/magnetic trousers=Illogicopedia:VFH/magnetic trousers|magnetic trousers=VFH/magnetic trousers|2018-12-18=2018-12-18|Japanese Cat=Japanese Cat|%ARGS%=§nominator=User:Japanese Cat§Japanese Cat (User talk:Japanese Cat§talk) 19:49, 18 Ditzimber 2018 (UTC) §for_count=1 §for=

§against_count=1 §against=

  • There's not enough in those three lines. {:User:Flyingcat/sig} 02:55, 2 Jeremy 2019 (UTC)

§comments=*I think this user should make a comment why s/he has nominated it.--{User:The_Pioneer/Sig} 09:15, 19 Ditzimber 2018 (UTC)

    • Agreed. Also, maybe in the meantime more stuff will be added to the article? :-) -- {:User:Hindleyite/sig} 17:24, 9 Jeremy 2019 (UTC)
      • I think this article is simple fun without being long or complex --{User:Japanese Cat/sig}

}}


Captain Censor (vote)

Score: 0 (1-1) Nomination by 162.233.177.60 22:15, 3 Arche 2021 (UTC)
For:
Against:
  • Just kinda meh. But that's just my opinion. CG098 (talk ☼‎ contribs) 01:26, 4 Arche 2021 (UTC)
Comments:


69 (vote)

Score: 0 (1-1) Nomination by (A) *user who# couldn't decide o^n a username (or signature) (talk) 15:44, 25 Arche 2021 (UTC)
For:
  • Ok, final self-nomination. plz make featured. -15:44, 25 Arche 2021 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:
  1. why no where near -(A) *user who# couldn't decide o^n a username (or signature) (talk) 17:09, 26 Arche 2021 (UTC)


Cat (vote)

Score: 2 (2-0) Nomination by The most Awesome of Cats (talk) 14:24, 10 Novelniver 2020 (UTC)
For:
Against:
Comments:

This NEEDS to be refeatured! IT IZ ABOOT KIIITEHZZ! The most Awesome of Cats (talk) 14:24, 10 Novelniver 2020 (UTC)

I don't think we refeature articles. I'm not aware that we've ever done that before. CG098 (talk ☼‎ contribs) 17:26, 14 Ditzimber 2020 (UTC)