Illogicopedia:VFH/Why Trees Should be put in the Witness Protection Agency...

From Illogicopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VOTING CLOSED
The voting below has ended, the result decided; save commenting, do not edit it.

Why Trees Should be put in the Witness Protection Agency...

Score: -1 (3-4) Nomination by T3 21:52, 18 Jumbly 2009 (UTC)
For:
  • NOM AND FOR: This article makes no sense whatsoever yet I found myself crying laughing while I read it. As THE put it, "Delightful nonsense". --T3 21:52, 18 Jumbly 2009 (UTC)
  • FORvaGinonater I exist! 22:14, 18 Jumbly 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Many will disagree but it's the plain definition of randumb. You don't find articles like this anymore on ?pedia. mwow513 • My Articles! • Talk to me 00:44, 19 Jumbly 2009 (UTC)
Against:
  • Against - Ya no. —rms talk 22:12, 18 Jumbly 2009 (UTC)
  • With RMS i'm shifting slowly towards him in a slightly intimidating manner. Oh, and the article needs to be longer and MOAR pics!--Ben Blade 22:24, 18 Jumbly 2009 (UTC)
    • Yeah, after reading Ben's I realized I should have put a legitmate reason for voting against. Um.... Short, needs pics, and it was a bit too random to really draw a laugh from me. —rms talk 22:29, 18 Jumbly 2009 (UTC)
  • Gno Testostereich • (ballsack) 08:57, 4 Ergust 2009 (UTC)
  • gainst it is delightful nonsense but I don't think it's feature-worthy. --THE 11:28, 5 Ergust 2009 (UTC)
Comments:

← Back to VFF

Retrieved from "https://en.illogicopedia.org/w/index.php?title=Illogicopedia:VFH/Why_Trees_Should_be_put_in_the_Witness_Protection_Agency...&oldid=108317"