Talk:The Roberto Code

For the record, this was my idea first. It's totally OK to take it and run with it and all, just thought I'd say. Nah nah nah nah nah, I thought of this before you did HA --Nerd42 14:33, 8 Arply 2011 (UTC)

And um, also, I don't like the direction of homosexuality and bestiality this has taken. --Nerd42 14:55, 8 Arply 2011 (UTC)

I don't quarrel with the direction so much as the juvenile, "I'm 12 years old and talking about cock on the internet... my friends must think it's hilarious" slant. I daresay it's not funny, and also not a great example of Illogicopedia content in any sense. Not very disGruntled - Exchange ideas 15:47, 8 Arply 2011 (UTC)

I was only bored and had nothing better to do than write an article on Illogicopedia. ( ﾟдﾟ) - Another n00b 18:38, 8 Arply 2011 (UTC)

This article needs a rewrite

1. For - It blows. Not very disGruntled - Exchange ideas 15:47, 8 Arply 2011 (UTC)
2. I'll be honest; this is somehow even worse than what he tends to do on Uncyclopedia... so yeah. ~ 02:42, 9 Arply 2011

That's because I have no Quality standards. So yeah - Another n00b 20:22, 9 Arply 2011 (UTC)

Well we do have quality standards. They're just really relaxed. --Nerd42 20:05, 14 Arply 2011 (UTC)

*gives Nerd a suspicious look* ~ 03:54, 15 Arply 2011