Forum:Time for another Werewolf?
Do you guys think its time we had another werewolf or two? iv noticed that our site seems to grow with the number of ops we place. Course that may just be me, but i think maybe we need another guy to help out.
Course, if you feel the same, don't say who you think will be suited, we can have a vote on that later.
So Admin or no admin? --Silent PenguinLeave Me Alone 00:29, 30 Arche 2008 (UTC)
- Yes admin. I said to you not long ago in IRC: "The community can be more moderated, less bad crap, less vandals basically = more appealing to new users and thus attracting more users" -- Ryan T. 00:33, 30 Arche 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think we need one. It'd feel like overkill. Yeah, we got more users but I think all us admins are doing enough as it is... the recent changes, if yew log off and browse as an IP is usually filled with green, bolded names. --
18:02, 30 Arche 2008 (UTC)
- "iv noticed that our site seems to grow with the number of ops we place." Isn't it the other way around, that we've added more ops due to growth (increasing our work load)? To me it seems that what's causing growth is the ongoing success of the community as a whole, not specifically the number of ops. Unless more ops improve the workings of the community, I rather doubt it will improve our growth.
- That said, now that the place is larger and there are more, we can specialize further. Unless we begin to get overly loaded with work, add not an op for the sake of adding an op, but do so if you find a person who could contribute and improve things as an op. --Fluffalizer
- No offence hopeful admins but I reckon (my reckoning being the be all and end all :P) that we don't really need any more admins. We get round to categorising just fine (with a l'il help from Kippers) and article coverage by admins is like a large squadron of flies coverage over a single measly stool. So no, my opinion is that we don't need another admin just yet though good luck to you if we do. Now I've got that bloody history essay.... ¬_¬ -- 20:23, 30 Arche 2008 (UTC)
- Woo, duncan agrees with me for once :P -- 20:25, 30 Arche 2008 (UTC)
- Ryan 4 admin, this should of happened a long time ago.
- Woo, duncan agrees with me for once :P --
- No offence hopeful admins but I reckon (my reckoning being the be all and end all :P) that we don't really need any more admins. We get round to categorising just fine (with a l'il help from Kippers) and article coverage by admins is like a large squadron of flies coverage over a single measly stool. So no, my opinion is that we don't need another admin just yet though good luck to you if we do. Now I've got that bloody history essay.... ¬_¬ -- 20:23, 30 Arche 2008 (UTC)
21:12, 31 Arche 2008 (UTC)Ben Blade
- Am I that trusted? Never knew that -- Ryan 23:29, 31 Arche 2008 (UTC)
NO! No admin. By the way I am back. No offence Ryan.... you don't.... seem to fit. Hellolleh and I have been around longer. I am a loyal Lord of commons welcome new people help them out...... But actually i dont feel we need one anyhow. Oh by the way... this website is like smoking. I try to lay off a bit but fail. Uhh. Im back. But dont expect many articles. I plan to be a janitor mostly.--
|Fonchezzz| Quacking|
21:19, 1 Arply 2008 (UTC)
- Heh, yayy fonchy's staying. If you're not in awriting mood the forum could do with some love. :P -- 21:22, 1 Arply 2008 (UTC)