| Score: 0 (3-3)
|
Nomination by Ryan ~ U T C ~ 10:09, 18 Jeremy 2008 (UTC)
|
| For:
|
- Self nom and for. I like it. --Ryan ~ U T C ~ 10:09, 18 Jeremy 2008 (UTC)
- For- Good article, good author.Ben Blade 15:45, 20 Jeremy 2008 (UTC)
- For! Could do with a couple of pics, though. PS Benedict, your sig's broke, dude! -- Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 20:38, 22 Jeremy 2008 (UTC)
|
| Against:
|
- Well i dunnno. It's a self nom... not that it is a bad thing to self nominate, but im too afraid to. But the article really was not good.--
 |Fonchezzz| Quacking| 20:02, 18 Jeremy 2008 (UTC)
- Against, it's more of the usual ducks, fruit, sonk. --I forgot 04:18, 19 Jeremy 2008 (UTC)
- Fraid Not no, --Testostereich • (ballsack) 14:26, 22 Jeremy 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments:
|
- Fonchezzz, you are the one who goes against everything I do or say, so how can I tell you are not just being your usual self, going against everything I say or do? --Ryan ~ U T C ~ 22:09, 18 Jeremy 2008 (UTC)
- I forgot, who cares? It's random, does it matter which words I use? --Ryan ~ U T C ~ 04:26, 19 Jeremy 2008 (UTC)
- I'll tell you what ryan, you come to my talk page and tell me a good article name and idea. We can then work on a huge project together using both our ideas. THEN we will have a great article.--|Fonchezzz| Quacking| 15:14, 20 Jeremy 2008 (UTC)
- It's getting very tense here! Ben Blade 15:45, 20 Jeremy 2008 (UTC)
- Im not sure if i should go for or against It's so hard...----|
 |Jojo RandomiseIm just plain Quackers!| 22:47, 21 Jeremy 2008 (UTC)
|
