Talk:The article for smart people
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
:-D -- Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 18:27, 9 Aym 2008 (UTC)
Wow[edit source]
This article was really insightful. I accessed all of this wonderful information and understood it all, because I'm smart. —rms talk 00:34, 12 Serpeniver 2010 (UTC)
- Awww, no fair. I'm such a moron I couldn't even figure out how to get to the article, let alone access it. *sniffle* ~
*shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20100912 - 01:13 (UTC)
- I know you are going to disagree, but the third section was my favorite. I have never seen more delightful prose outside of the Ivy League Times! Still, the fourth section did have its merits. --Bagelman talk to me ! 15:02, 12 Serpeniver 2010 (UTC)
- I much preferred section 4; theoretical physics are much more interesting to me than historical English scholars (Why are those twos sections near each other, anyway? It throws off the organization big time). —rms talk 15:46, 12 Serpeniver 2010 (UTC)
- What? How'd you guys get in? I can't get in! I CAN'T GET IN! Wait, that's the point. Sorry.--
(Talk) (Contributions) 00:34, 6 Octodest 2010 (UTC)
- Get in? Get in where? You mean there's a door into this giant boot here? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101006 - 01:37 (UTC)
- Get in? Get in where? You mean there's a door into this giant boot here? ~
- What? How'd you guys get in? I can't get in! I CAN'T GET IN! Wait, that's the point. Sorry.--
- I much preferred section 4; theoretical physics are much more interesting to me than historical English scholars (Why are those twos sections near each other, anyway? It throws off the organization big time). —rms talk 15:46, 12 Serpeniver 2010 (UTC)
- I know you are going to disagree, but the third section was my favorite. I have never seen more delightful prose outside of the Ivy League Times! Still, the fourth section did have its merits. --Bagelman talk to me ! 15:02, 12 Serpeniver 2010 (UTC)
