HowTo:Write a decent article in an hour
This article is just one of many
from the depths of Illogicopedia's Mass Cheese Reserves.
See more guides at WikiHowl.
Writing a decent article in an hour is not as hard as you might think. In fact, it's much, much worse. Only writers with talent, a good sense of humour and the ability to write well can accomplish the task. Writers who do not have talent and have a shitty sense of humour will not be able to make a decent article in an hour. That explains why this article is shit.
Anyway, back to the point, there are three basic steps to writing a good article:
- Come up with a good concept
- Write the article
- Add in/link to in-jokes/cock jokes
- Spam your article so people read it
Oh my, it appears I have forgotten how to count. There are really five reasons. *sigh*
Now, normally a good writ would take each of these steps and expand into thoroughly funny and entertaining sections that would tie the article together in a pleasing fashion, and they would manage to do it it in an hour. I however, suck at writing, and have a sense of humour so rotten it's comparable to a pile of moldy sponges. This means that instead making this article funny and enjoyable I will end it abruptly with no apparent cohesion.
Testimonials[edit | edit source]
“This article did not help me, it sucks.”
“This wasn't effective at all.”
“I can't tell you how great it was supposeed to be, but really wasn't.”
“The author of this article needs to be shot immediately.”
And, with this, I shall end the article without summing it up or adding any sort of punchline. Also, I will include a See Also section, or something.
Untimely Conclusion[edit | edit source]
In conclusion, this article was written in an hour and is not decent. Et tu, irony?
If you were too lazy to read this crap: the new, limited edition, tl;dr version![edit | edit source]
| Blah blah blah, something about cocks. Now don't delete this so I can win a contest for once in my life. |
