Illogicopedia:VFH/YouTube Comments

From Illogicopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VOTING CLOSED
The voting below has ended, the result decided; save commenting, do not edit it.

YouTube Comments

Score: 11 (11-0) Nomination by Hindleyak  Converse?blogClick here! 13:20, 28 Ditzimber 2009 (UTC)
For:
  • For. Just throwing this out there, cos you know, it's being worked on ATM, but awesomeness beckons. -- Hindleyak  Converse?blogClick here! 13:20, 28 Ditzimber 2009 (UTC)
  • It made me lol, and then while I was laughing put a gun behind my head and got me to vote for it. Cracking stufff Gromit. Testostereich(ballsack) 14:38, 28 Ditzimber 2009 (UTC)
  • rms talk 21:51, 28 Ditzimber 2009 (UTC)
  • For simply because this article is so true. --T3 22:39, 28 Ditzimber 2009 (UTC)
  • PHOAR!! Thanks <3 --Galanoth 17:50, 29 Ditzimber 2009 (UTC)
  • For I've seen some like it but it's not repetitive - very good. I hope it won't get overworked if it's still under construction. -- Mu Oranssiviiva.jpg st 11:23, 5 Jeremy 2010 (UTC)
  • Fr --THE 21:44, 10 Jeremy 2010 (UTC)
  • Phwoar Outstanding --Plant2.png Jonsig.png 21:50, 10 Jeremy 2010 (UTC)
  • goo 'arn--Ben Blade 21:01, 14 Jeremy 2010 (UTC)
  • Nice work. CamelToe 03:21, 28 Farbleum 2010 (UTC)
  • FOr Lolz-- Ragglefraggleking Is Eating Your Bagels
  • 4I have no clue why im voteing. its going to become featured anyway. ^_^ Illogic armada 01:39, 10 Arche 2010 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:
  • Sure, it is interesting, humourous and true to life, but it's hardly a jewel, i feel it needs some improvement, a few more jokes, some formatting satire, you know, make it look like a youtube page, then it would be perfect. Hence for now, i'm not going to vote in it's favour, i just feel if it goes straight to feature, then this concept will go to waste since nobody will bother polishing off some good material.--Silent Penguin 15:09, 11 Jeremy 2010 (UTC)
    • I'm with Seppy on this. Would be a massive waste to feature an article when it's not even finished yet. MMF3.jpgMyMetalFratboytalk 15:53, 11 Jeremy 2010 (UTC)
    • Good point. When I nommed this I expected it to be worked on a lot more -- a kind of incentive for it to be finished off -- but I don't know if it's even been touched since 28th December. -- Hindleyak  Converse?blogClick here! 12:55, 13 Jeremy 2010 (UTC)
  • Seppy: How is it now? I gave it some work. —rms talk 04:46, 28 Farbleum 2010 (UTC)
    • I like the graphical additions. I haven't a clue what's happening in the video though, is there any chance you could make that funnier? I get the feeling you're missing a trick. Maybe we could create and embed our own vid for the article? Dunno. -- Hindleyak  Converse?blogClick here! 11:50, 28 Farbleum 2010 (UTC)
  • Just vunderin', is this the highest an article has won with? 10 nil is pretty impressive.--Ben Blade 13:04, 28 Farbleum 2010 (UTC)
    • Maybe so, usually stuff is queued when it gets to 4 or 5, but we've kept it up while the necessary improvements to the article are being made. I'm curious to see what happens if we leave it in VFF for a bit longer... -- Hindleyak  Converse?blogClick here! 12:49, 2 Arche 2010 (UTC)

Back to VFF