Forum:Ask a silly question, get a silly answer/archive3
What is the meaning of this? -- Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 19:11, 25 Farbleum 2008 (UTC)
pronoun (pl. these |ðēz|)
- used to identify a specific person or thing close at hand or being indicated or experienced
- used to introduce someone or something
- referring to the nearer of two things close to the speaker (the other, if specified, being identified by “that”)
- referring to a specific thing or situation just mentioned
adjective (pl. these)
- used to identify a specific person or thing close at hand or being indicated or experienced
- referring to the nearer of two things close to the speaker (the other, if specified, being identified by “that”)
- referring to a specific thing or situation just mentioned
- used with periods of time related to the present
- referring to a period of time that has just passed
- informal used (chiefly in narrative) to refer to a person or thing previously unspecified
adverb [as submodifier] to the degree or extent indicated
Did I really need to use a dictionary? Some WHAT!? number two 19:22, 25 Farbleum 2008 (UTC)
No, use tissues.
Are you asleep? Anotherpongo 18:24, 26 Farbleum 2008 (UTC)
Just about as much as I love tomato catsup!
Should I call the police back about that murder charge they're offering? -- 20:00, 26 Farbleum 2008 (UTC)
No.
Yes?--Jessica C. Duck, the Oddity
Maybe baby.
Would it be appropriate if Little Miss Oddity was a baby? -- 20:07, 9 Arche 2008 (UTC)
As William does when saying bleeeeeeeeeee...
Are you pulling the forum in this direction because that is your way of reforming your ways? Some WHAT!? (talk) (contribs) (edit count) 20:57, 9 Arche 2008 (UTC)
Did Somewhat no.2 force this attrocity? -- 20:59, 9 Arche 2008 (UTC)
Ha. I have been the next to comment, so Testostereich has referred to his listener in the third person, which is gramatically incorrect.
If it is gramatically incorrect, then why have I begun to do the same? Some WHAT!? (talk) (contribs) (edit count) 21:04, 9 Arche 2008 (UTC)
Because of the covert closing of the circle.
?? -- 21:06, 9 Arche 2008 (UTC)
!!
!?!?
Punctuation can be misleading.
Is this full stop that's leading me into a ditch intending to steal my car keys? Or is it the fact the same two people have been talking back and forth, back and forth on this page for a while? -- 21:15, 9 Arche 2008 (UTC)
Amounts of content can be misleading.
Is the cycle going to continue?
Would I let that happen? -- 21:26, 9 Arche 2008 (UTC)
Yes, but with nonsense.
Shall I proceed to eat my computer? Some WHAT!? (talk) (contribs) (edit count) 21:49, 9 Arche 2008 (UTC)
I hear mac's are tasty this time of year.
Should my RAM drive burn like that? -- 06:50, 10 Arche 2008 (UTC)
Error: computer must shut down.
What question am I asking? Some WHAT!? (talk) (contribs) (edit count) 11:53, 10 Arche 2008 (UTC)
The second one.
Does the S in NASA stand for Sorcery? -- 22:04, 10 Arche 2008 (UTC)
No, it stands for sauerkraut.
If you take a chicken, a grape, and the Great Pyramid, and you morph them together, what does it look like? Some WHAT!? (talk) (contribs) (edit count) 00:15, 11 Arche 2008 (UTC)
A wonderful exotic chicken soup. It tastes like ten thousand year old rock - not that I've tasted it.
Why is the Sunderland FC wiki featured? -- Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 19:32, 12 Arche 2008 (UTC)
Why is it wiki-featured? Ah! That is... something I don't know.
Can a hyphen change the wor(l)d? Some WHAT!? (talk) (contribs) (edit count) 22:11, 12 Arche 2008 (UTC)
Three Hyphons for the Elven-kings under the sky,
Seven for the Dwarf-lords in their halls of stone,
Nine for Mortal Men doomed to die,
One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.
One Hyphon to rule them all, One Hyphon to find them,
One Hyphon to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.
Lolwut? -- 14:03, 16 Arche 2008 (UTC)
Wtfbrb!
Think of it as a box.
What makes my computer screen resemble a potato? Some WHAT!? (talk) (contribs) (edit count) 22:46, 23 Arche 2008 (UTC)
Because the shadow of your mishaped head is on the screen! (Your head is shaped as a potatoe!)-- 16:52, 24 Arche 2008 (UTC)
How come the ba jibble party isnt getting any new members?-- 16:52, 24 Arche 2008 (UTC)
because the ORGASM party is giving out free orgasm!
Out there somewhere? --
20:43, 24 Arche 2008 (UTC)
No, I'm right here... Inside your mind...
Is it safe? Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:40, 24 Arche 2008 (UTC) Eh?
Yes, I am about to dance on my television!
What is your evil plan?
To smuggle back a small cache of plundered diamonds and to kill all the former government couriers between me and my prize. The only problem is that the brother of one of the deceased couriers, an average marathon man/college student living in New York, may or may not be wise to my scheme and attempt revenge for his sibling's death.
Sooooooooooo.......... Is it safe? Mr. Briggs Inc. 01:03, 27 Arche 2008 (UTC) Eh?
Sorry mate, the pie gone stinky
How many seppys does it take to fix a lightbulb?
12:07, 27 Arche 2008 (UTC)Ben Blade
One, because he can change it with the power of his mind! You wouldn't believe some of the other stuff he can do...
A classic question now! Why does the floor not float off? -- Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 12:19, 27 Arche 2008 (UTC)
The ground has a bad severance package.
What's our purpose in life? --I forgot 00:32, 28 Arche 2008 (UTC)
To devouror all of the little jingle bells in the wurld!
Why does a nacho have power? -- 00:47, 30 Arche 2008 (UTC)
Well, the governing systems of these world's are like a big house. All the fat boring people are upstairs, the heirachy, because they're too fat to get out of bed. The rest of us, the public, are downstairs - enjoying our rave. Naturally a Nacho is needed in an advisory capacity upstairs.
Goodnight ladies and, uhh, gentlemen? -- 21:58, 1 Arply 2008 (UTC)
A silly answer.
Why is this question not silly? -- 09:17, 2 Arply 2008 (UTC)
Eeble jeeble McFreeble. Blee.
? -- Ryan 10:10, 2 Arply 2008 (UTC)
I am writing this letter purely in the spirit of uplifting and sharing, as corny and dated as those sentiments may sound in the fast-moving and ever-evolving modern techno-plastic times in which we live. Primarily, I want to share with you my view that Question Mark's treatment of nepotism mirrors the attitude that many slatternly wimps hold towards despotism. Before I launch into my rant, permit me the prelude caveat that Question Mark's hatchet men don't represent an ideology. They don't represent a legitimate political group of people. They're just flat illiberal. Question Mark has no standards of decency and I'm not making that up! Question Mark is totally mistaken if it believes that the best way to reduce cognitive dissonance and restore homeostasis to one's psyche is to silence critical debate and squelch creative brainstorming. Question Mark has a talent for inventing fantasy worlds in which bloody-minded deranged-types are all inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. Then again, just because Question Mark is a prolific fantasist doesn't mean that individual worth is defined by race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin. Let Question Mark's acrimonious antics stand as evidence that Question Mark cannot be tamed by "tolerance" and "accommodation" but is actually spurred on by such gestures. It sees such gestures as a sign of weakness on our part and is thereby encouraged to continue turning anarchists loose against us good citizens. Can you believe that Question Mark actually stated that the rigors that its victims have been called upon to undergo have been amply justified in the sphere of concrete achievement? I was stunned until I remembered that Question Mark aims at nothing less than the complete overthrow of capitalism, representational government, and democracy. I'll go further: When I say that Question Mark's tracts are pretentious, I mean it. I don't mean that they remind me of something pretentious or that they have one or two pretentious characteristics. I mean that they are pretentious. In fact, the most pretentious thing about them is the way that they prevent people from seeing that Question Mark has stated that it has its moral compass in tact. One clear inference from that statement -- an inference that is never really disavowed -- is that it can ignore rules, laws, and protocol without repercussion. Now that's just cuckoo. According to the latest scientific evidence, I am reminded of the quote, "There must be some ascertainable mental block that makes it so abhorrent." This comment is not as two-faced as it seems because Question Mark's opinion is that ethnocentrism is a noble goal. Of course, opinions are like sphincters: we all have them. So let me tell you my opinion. My opinion is that the claim that there is an international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids is illusory. In view of that, it is not surprising that if Question Mark thinks that it can walk on water then maybe it should lay off the wacky tobacky. When I first heard about Question Mark's convictions, I didn't know whether to laugh, because Question Mark's expositions are so nutty, or cry, because this makes me fearful that I might someday find myself in the crosshairs of Question Mark's incomprehensible, mentally deficient grievances. (To be honest, though, it wouldn't be the first time.) Must it be explained to Question Mark that it sees life as a morally questionable game without any rules? Because it obviously doesn't realize that its quips are merely a stalking horse. They mask Question Mark's secret intention to stonewall on issues in which taxpayers see a vital public interest. I, speaking as someone who is not a delusional, overbearing traitor, want to raise several issues about Question Mark's insincere memoranda that are frequently missing from the drivel that masquerades for discourse on this topic. That may seem simple enough, but Question Mark recently stated that going through the motions of working is the same as working. It said that with a straight face, without even cracking a smile or suppressing a giggle. It said it as if it meant it. That's scary because I like to speak of it as "wishy-washy". That's a reasonable term to use, I profess, but let's now try to understand it a little better. For starters, to say that clever one-liners are a valid substitute for actual thinking is feebleminded nonsense and untrue to boot. It is not the case -- notwithstanding what Question Mark's doctrinaire propaganda so adamantly proclaims -- that sin is good for the soul. With this central point cleared up, the rest of Question Mark's arguments are rendered moot, as if you can make any sense out its corrupt zingers then you must have gotten higher marks in school than I did. I suppose we could get Question Mark to shut up by giving rise to disdainful junkies. Obviously, that Question Mark-esque scheme is akin to throwing out the baby with the bath water. Let me propose instead that we carve solutions that are neither peremptory nor headstrong. Trumpeted so many times, Question Mark's ramblings have begun to feed on themselves, to generate their own publicity, to cow their opponents not by argument but by sheer repetition, and to bring ugliness and nastiness into our lives. When Question Mark was first found trying to undermine liberty in the name of liberty, I was scared. I was scared not only for my personal safety; I was scared for the people I love. And now that Question Mark is planning to etiolate its enemies, I'm terrified. Insipid revanchism is not new. Now, I could go off on that point alone, but it works from the false assumption that most people actually want gloomy, aberrant hoodlums to perpetuate the nonsense known technically as the analytic/synthetic dichotomy. Hence and therefore, if you were to ask Question Mark, it'd say that it doesn't remember plaguing our minds. Not only does Question Mark have a very selective memory, but I am not predicting anything specific. I just have a feeling, an intuition, based on several things that are happening now that Question Mark will displace meaningful discussion of an issue's merit or demerit with hunch and emotion in the immediate years ahead. I may not be perfect, but at least I'm not afraid to say that there is one crucial fact that we must not overlook if we are to perceive our current situation as it is, rather than in the anamorphosis of some "ideology" such as autism or credentialism. Specifically, my long-term goal is to advance freedom in countries strangled by tyranny. Unfortunately, much remains to be done. As you may have noticed, Question Mark acts as if it were King of the World. This hauteur is astonishing, staggering, and mind-boggling. I don't know what sort of abuse Question Mark was subjected to as a child that made it such a vapid, fastidious scapegrace but I do know that I am prepared to state my views and stand by them. That's just a fancy way of saying that there are some simple truths in this world. First, a great many decent people are just as distressed as I am about Question Mark's crotchets. Second, those who fight against Question Mark's oleaginous prank phone calls are inevitably branded as gruesome and amoral by Question Mark's surrogates. And finally, Question Mark must sense its own irremediable inferiority. That's why it is so desperate to threaten the existence of human life, perhaps all life on the planet; it's the only way for it to distinguish themselves from the herd. It would be a lot nicer, however, if Question Mark also realized that there is no place in this country where we are safe from its deputies, no place where we are not targeted for hatred and attack. I don't mean to scare you, but Question Mark's arrogance will lead it to create a Question Mark-centric society in which lazy cozeners dictate the populace's values and myths, its traditions and archetypes, in the near future. That conclusion is not based on some sort of xenophobic philosophy or on Question Mark-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that Question Mark spouts the same bile in everything it writes, making only slight modifications to suit the issue at hand. The issue it's excited about this week is larrikinism, which says to me that Question Mark believes that it is a perpetual victim of injustice. Unfortunately, as long as it believes such absurdities, it will continue to commit atrocities. I believe it was Hegel who said, "It is sad to see it unleash an unparalleled wave of extremism". If Question Mark can't be reasoned out of its prejudices, it must be laughed out of them. If Question Mark can't be argued out of its selfishness, it must be shamed out of it. The whole of Question Mark's vulgar worldview may perhaps be expressed in one simple word. That word is "jujuism". Let me explain: Teenagers who want to shock their parents sometimes maintain -- with a straight face -- that vandalism forms the core of any utopian society. Fortunately, most parents don't fall for this fraud because they know that Question Mark has repeatedly threatened to shame my name. Maybe that's just for maximum scaremongering effect. Or maybe it's because Question Mark's criticisms of my letters have never successfully disproved a single fact I ever presented. Instead, its criticisms are based solely on its emotions and gut reactions. Well, I refuse to get caught up in Question Mark's "I think … I believe … I feel" game. In closing, we must work together to reveal the truth about Question Mark's credos. Together, we can make a difference. Forever and always.
Why did I write a 10-paragraph essay on Question Mark? -- 11:33, 3 Arply 2008 (UTC)
Cause it looks nice
42?
12:58, 3 Arply 2008 (UTC)Ben Blade
69
why is the pie not with us today ````
Because Ryan appears to have his shift keys missing.
Do locomotives know how to add? Some WHAT!? (talk) (contribs) (edit count) 19:10, 3 Arply 2008 (UTC)
They'd better, or Thomas the Tank is a bad role model for my children.
Is Virgle a viable business venture? -- Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 19:59, 3 Arply 2008 (UTC)
Not since the market was hit hard by the winter penis famine.
Are crumpets a good means of online messaging? -- 07:44, 4 Arply 2008 (UTC)
Only 16 left, I'm afraid.
O.o? -- 07:56, 4 Arply 2008 (UTC)
I always knew your face was some kind of formatting inequity.
Why are half the sigs on this site really annoying when you click "go insane in the membrane" on an article they've been signed with? -- 20:41, 6 Arply 2008 (UTC)
I'll tell you when you're old enough to understand the difference between "lately" and a "fire brigand obsession".
Is there a way to find out who is responsible for the fact that... NO! GET AWAY FROM ME! I KNOW NOTHING! You can't do that! NO! NOOOOOOOOO!!! D. G. Neree 00:32, 26 Arply 2008 (UTC)
I have one word to say to you, just one word: plastics.
What does it mean if? Some WHAT!? (talk) (contribs) (edit count) 01:18, 26 Arply 2008 (UTC)
Boogie Woogie!
Why does the poo cry bingo? 02:49, 27 Arply 2008 (UTC)
Cos it's sad. And don't call me Bingo. :)
Why is a toaster like an automated phone line? -- Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 19:08, 1 Aym 2008 (UTC)
Look at it this way Watson, if it wasn't like an automated phone line, then what would the toaster be? It would have no purpose save toasting bread. This lack of meaning to it's exsistance may deeplydepress the Toaster, so much so, that it becomes a negetive influence on society which needs to be eliminated!
By any means necessary? -- 19:13, 1 Aym 2008 (UTC)
Yes, even if it means resorting to a mixture of butter, oil, elbow grease and chicken belly button fluff.
Does this bus go to Orpington? -- Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 19:15, 1 Aym 2008 (UTC)
Yes. It also goes to the lost city of Atlantis.
Am I and idiot just bacause I liek to speak emo? nosubst: --Hey, its Maureen, don't profanitise in an excessive, yet accomodating manner with me! 19:27, 1 Aym 2008 (UTC)
I believe it to be the sign of deeeper issues within you're life. Like the niggly feeling in the back of your mind, that no matter how hard you try, just won't go away. The thought of threee e's being used in the place of the required two would kill me inside as well.
Did I put the cat out? -- 21:46, 1 Aym 2008 (UTC)
To answer that question, you must look deep into your mind.
What do you see? Some WHAT!? (talk) (contribs) (edit count) 22:54, 1 Aym 2008 (UTC)
My cervial cortex.
How did I get my eyes to point inwards? -- 07:09, 2 Aym 2008 (UTC)
Pull them out, and stick them in back in backwards.
How do I know if I'm in love with my 50-yr-old sencond cousin, Dwight? nosubst: --Hey, its Maureen, don't profanitise in an excessive, yet accomodating manner with me! 16:28, 2 Aym 2008 (UTC)
Please, no more shameless article advertisements
The Important Mission? -- 21:57, 3 Aym 2008 (UTC)
No.
Is testostereich really an admin? --Hey, its Maureen, don't profanitise in an excessive, yet accomodating manner with me! 01:06, 4 Aym 2008 (UTC)
Is Sk8R Grl really a normal user? Some WHAT!? (talk) (contribs) (edit count) 02:14, 4 Aym 2008 (UTC)
Yes, duhr.
What the heck does Some WHAT!? number two mean anyway? :) --Hey, its Maureen, don't profanitise in an excessive, yet accomodating manner with me! 18:04, 4 Aym 2008 (UTC)
Somewhat number 2 is the name donned by somwehat after he forgot his password under pseudonyme "Somewhat", much like your name. That or he likes Llamas sexually, I'm not sure which.
Is my bigger toe, the biggest finger you've ever seen? -- 19:52, 4 Aym 2008 (UTC)
No: a finger of fudge is bigger.
Did anyone remember to bring the ice cream sandwiches? -- Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 11:14, 5 Aym 2008 (UTC)
I did, but after I took them into the toilet with me they mysteriously changed to chocolate flavour. XD
Should we archive some of the older/redundandant topics of the forum to tidy it up, then have another wiki wide drive to get people active on it. Thinking uopp new exciting toipics? 11:22, 5 Aym 2008 (UTC)
That sounds just dandy Mr Testicles.
Will this sentence survive the archiving holocaust? -- Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 11:27, 5 Aym 2008 (UTC)
So long as it isn't Jewish, asocial, homosexual, a race defiler, disabled, unemployed, opposed to the illogia, communist, criminal, homeless or the holy grail.
Loose fit, maximum comfort? -- 13:45, 5 Aym 2008 (UTC)
Archived topic
to pwnt? or not to pwnt? --Silent PenguinLeave Me Alone 13:47, 5 Aym 2008 (UTC)
Hey! You didn't archive the topic, you traitorous scum!
You love it really? -- 17:29, 5 Aym 2008 (UTC)
I don't love it really as much as I love it fakely. But then, it depends what it is. Is it some sort of stabby thingy?
If I didn't make a link, does it still count as article advertising? Some WHAT!? (talk) (contribs) (edit count) 19:42, 5 Aym 2008 (UTC)
I've said it once, and I'll say it again: Silent Penguin's Bogus Journey. No further questions.
Does that answer your silly question? -- 20:13, 5 Aym 2008 (UTC)
No.
Does your name have anything to do with test--les? --Hey, its Maureen, don't profanitise in an excessive, yet accomodating manner with me! 04:13, 7 Aym 2008 (UTC)
Not as such, bbut it does bare some relation to it. I originally intended to fuse the two words 'Testosterone' and 'Reich', but it also worked as a fusion of 'Testicles' and 'Osterich', which is cool I guess. But to fulfill the 'silly answer' this forum page so very desires I answer you with this: glarglblarf eeble sonk eee!!!
Will Manchester United win the superbowl? -- 06:40, 8 Aym 2008 (UTC)
Naw, I got money on the Dallas Cowboys. blaaaaaaaaaahhhhfartgooochiegobleepcensor ddooodooko
What in Tarnation is a superbowl? --Hey, its Maureen, don't profanitise in an excessive, yet accomodating manner with me! 15:01, 8 Aym 2008 (UTC)
It's the device Hagrid uses to hold his Cheerio's.
Why are there tarnations in Hagrid's Breakfast? -- 15:39, 8 Aym 2008 (UTC)
/me shrugs. I dont know. I dont even know what a tarnation is.
What in tarnation is a tarnation? --Hey, its Maureen, don't profanitise in an excessive, yet accomodating manner with me! 15:57, 8 Aym 2008 (UTC)
A tarnation is a bowl of eager tapioca spiced with the winds of the east, or if you prefer a loud trunk awning.
What would I say if you asked me what I would say? --I forgot 18:19, 8 Aym 2008 (UTC)
To be honest I think you'd forget.
This page is getting slow we may need to archive it again, no? -- 18:55, 8 Aym 2008 (UTC)
This page is 37 killerbananas long! Of course so!
What would you say, I forgot? Some WHAT!? (talk) (contribs) (edit count) 19:11, 8 Aym 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, I forgot what we were talking about.
Oh deary me, will I ever see pink again? -- 19:57, 8 Aym 2008 (UTC)
Indeed you shall. In fact, you just did.
Why did you respond when I was asking I forgot? Some WHAT!? (talk) (contribs) (edit count) 21:51, 8 Aym 2008 (UTC)
Because he "likes" you !!! -- 00:47, 9 Aym 2008 (UTC)
Cheese is good for those people without cheese --
Dxpenguinman, the Penguinman ...He's e-vile! • Talk • Got An Idea? • GAMESHOW!