Forum:The Uncyclopedia article on Illogicopedia

<<< Back to Logical Sector • <<< Back to Forum

It ain't the worst article I've seen ever, but I feel it needs the odd lick of paint. Maybe some sort of a rewrite may be in order? After all, the current version's been there since the dawn of time. Plus, if we all pitch in, people might see it and think "wow, that Ullogicopeeedio looks like a website I might visit for one day and then never even think about again!" Alternatively, we can just trim the fat. -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 12:14, 29 Jeremy 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, we should do that. —rms talk 15:15, 29 Jeremy 2010 (UTC)

Actually, I feel said article provides an adequate insight into the typical level of humorous insanity that can be highlighted by Illogicopedia articles; and moreover already is marked with the "crap" template, rendering this suggestion rather an epic waste of time, to use Internet vernacular. --Galanoth 17:29, 29 Jeremy 2010 (UTC)

I decided to rewrite it; it really isn't a proper Uncyclopedia article. Whatever that means, coming from someone who writes everything there from the first person perspective of an utter madman...

I hope nobody minds. Not that I'm overly likely to ever actually finish, so I'm not sure why I'm even bringing this up... oh well. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101016 - 19:46 (UTC)

No objections here, or from anywhere from what I can see. All the other admins naffed off to that no-ammo place I really should be dedicating more time to, so yeah, go nuts. I might offer a helping hand or two if I can make it across the road to Uncyclo without being squashed like a geriatric hedgehog. -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 20:44, 16 Octodest 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, it's pretty good now.-- (Talk) (Contributions) 21:26, 16 Octodest 2010 (UTC)

I want to get it featured. *shifty eyes* The current direction it's going is just... meh. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101016 - 21:31 (UTC)

Am I missing something? This is just the same as before. —rms talk 21:35, 16 Octodest 2010 (UTC)

That's because I haven't started yet, silly. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101016 - 21:38 (UTC)

Hm. Get on to it then!-- (Talk) (Contributions) 01:39, 17 Octodest 2010 (UTC)

First I need to proofread and beat more sense into this IC article and do a review I said I would and fill the manhole with madness and rewrite another article and... er... no wonder I never get anything done over there. >.< ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101017 - 02:10 (UTC)

This is where I'm working on it. It'll get content later. Please don't hurt me. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101018 - 04:30 (UTC)

I suppose by later, you mean never.--ColbertNation 00:39, 24 Octodest 2010 (UTC)

No, I will! I will! Like... soon? O_o; ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101024 - 03:04 (UTC)

Well, all right then!--ColbertNation 16:42, 25 Octodest 2010 (UTC)

I... started. I even got an idea. It's pretty bad one, though. It winds up with all of the Illogicopedians dead and a bunch of Uncyclopedians trying to hide the evidence. I'll write it later, but I blame it all on rms. And sharks. Definitely sharks. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101025 - 18:51 (UTC)

But ol' S. Hark didn't done nothin! —rms talk 22:59, 25 Octodest 2010 (UTC)

No... not yet. But that will soon change. *laughs evilly* ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101025 - 23:15 (UTC)

Your current draft seems pretty good, and you could definitely build on it.-- (Talk) (Contributions) 05:33, 26 Octodest 2010 (UTC)

I'm working on it, I'm working on it. It's not my fault I happen to be in the middle of five other projects... and that's just there and here; nevermind non-wiki stuff. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101026 - 11:58 (UTC)

Dump the non-wiki crap. There's no point to it. TOO MUCH LABOURGH! So, anyway, a good start for an Uncyc article on this humble beacon deviating from Satire or Satir, whichever Uncyc ruthlessly enforces.ColbertNation 16:55, 26 Octodest 2010 (UTC)

But the non-wiki crap pays for my presence amidst the wiki-crap... and for a start, it's rubbish... everything always starts out rubbish. I mean... thanks. *smacks self with a piece of lumber* ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101026 - 22:51 (UTC)

I still think we should eschew the non-wiki crap. No value to it. Anyway, while you're not busy writing another Illogic article on Uncyc, I will be writing another Uncyc article on Illogic. here. Meh, maybe your satir on this site at Uncyc will get somewhere eventually. Kudos.--ColbertNation 17:07, 27 Octodest 2010 (UTC)

I need to pay for my food, love. Among other things, but I think that's the first I'd really notice losing. I like food. Don't you like food?

Actually, I'm more likely to be busy beating other people's articles over the head with frying pans, but shiny, shiny. Let's see who can come up with the greater heap of bollocks, eh? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101027 - 19:16 (UTC)

Interestingly, I am actually the one who originally wrote the first paragraph of Uncyclopedia:About - the bit about unicycles. Kind of um, ironic. --Nerd42 23:24, 14 Aym 2011 (UTC)

Not really. Unicycles are interesting pieces of historical propaganda. But, why ye writeth on Uncle Pete?--Colonel Sanders 23:29, 14 Aym 2011 (UTC)

What do you mean, why? I hadn't started Illogicopedia yet at that point. --Nerd42 00:00, 16 Aym 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, it was so early he hadn't even started school yet. -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 14:44, 16 Aym 2011 (UTC)