Talk:Crossbow

Intriguingly weird. Engaging, even. -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 20:31, 22 Serpeniver 2010 (UTC)

Why, thanks. Plenty of folks on Uncyclopedia didn't seem to appreciate it, though... wanted it to actually be funny, silly things. Who needs funny when you can have MANHOLES!? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20100922 - 23:39 (UTC)

As a militant heterosexual, I had a tramp stamp done that says "Exit Only" with an arrow pointing to my... well, you know... I'm not going to say it... that'll make me blush. This article is very funny, by the way. Cheers! Presently not disGruntled - Exchange ideas 18:01, 24 Serpeniver 2010 (UTC)

This makes me think of a serial killer's private thoughts. Presently not disGruntled - Exchange ideas 18:12, 24 Serpeniver 2010 (UTC)

You are (possibly) the Stephen King of random humor. Presently not disGruntled - Exchange ideas 18:13, 24 Serpeniver 2010 (UTC)

Eh, wrong sort of manhole. That was what the requested articles thing on uncyclopedia said for the manhole entry, but I of course ignored it completely... I mean, really. People these days.

Serial killers, though... now those are fun. Some, of course, have more interesting thoughts than others, but the perspectives are just glorious. And often quite horrible, but hey.

And possibly not, eh? Probably not, I'd say. He manages random horror rather well. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20100924 - 18:42 (UTC)

I understood that your manholes were not that sort of hole. In the spirit of the almost-non sequitur ?Pedia constants, I just blurted that drivel out as a smokescreen to distract while I nommed it. Cheers! Presently not disGruntled - Exchange ideas 18:50, 24 Serpeniver 2010 (UTC)

Eh, I figured. I also think you should know that distracting me is unnecessary; I'm invariably distracted already. And I think you should also also know that it already failed uncyclopedia's VFH for being not funny, and if it fails again here, I'll... well, not really care that much, actually. I'm over being a skittish over-caring noob. That was just silly.

Thanks for the nom, at any rate. ^^ ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20100924 - 19:21 (UTC)

At any rate (or at least the rate we're currently going), I did an experiment on Uncyc some whiles ago. I tried to push a bat fuck piece of vanity through VFH, completely expecting to be shot down of course. It was called uncyclopedia:HowTo:Be Reverend Zim_ulator. And of course, it was rightfully shot down. The funny thing is, it was a featured HowTo... completely unexpected, for me. I'm considering polluting their pages with some of the drivel I've come up with here, just to see the drama or whatever might follow. Shhhh! don't tell anybody! You're welcome for the nom... it is the finest piece of nonsense I've seen at ?pedia thus far, honest. Presently not disGruntled - Exchange ideas 21:08, 24 Serpeniver 2010 (UTC)

Ooooo, so that's who you are? Which, since I didn't know you before anyway, doesn't really change anything, but it is kind of interesting.

Anyways, as pieces of vanity go, that one's not that bad. It is rather amusing, at least; I can see why it'd have gotten some featuring. It's not like it's boring stuff about your dog, after all. And if you do take drivel over, well... some of the drivel isn't even bad by uncyclopedia standards. If you limit it to the nicer stuff, I doubt it'd cause any drama at all. Perhaps some complaining might ensue that they need expanding... they tend to be short. I suspect you'd have to use the more illogical, pointless stuff to cause drama, and even then it might take goading. You know, this could prove interesting...

And... oh dear. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20100925 - 00:17 (UTC)

I like man holes lol —rms talk 05:19, 25 Serpeniver 2010 (UTC)

...which type? *suspicious look* ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20100925 - 05:26 (UTC)

featured on both pages

illogicopedia and wikipedia Poiz 21:40, 27 Octodest 2010 (UTC) btw, i am poiz from uncuclopedia

It hasn't been featured on Illogicopedia, nor is it even on Wikipedia... what are you meaning? And aye, indeed. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101027 - 22:03 (UTC)

i meant uncyclopediaPoiz 22:05, 27 Octodest 2010 (UTC)

Oh. Well, that's the only place it had been featured. Likely to remain that way. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101028 - 00:08 (UTC)

WAS it featured there? Last time I checked, it wasn't featured anywhere. But it got a good score on a Pee Review.-- (Talk) (Contributions) 03:42, 28 Octodest 2010 (UTC)

You're the one who reviewed it, you nut. And it was featured. After you were saying it wasn't good enough for there here, I renommed it and it passed. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101028 - 04:25 (UTC)

Really? Cool.-- (Talk) (Contributions) 10:02, 28 Octodest 2010 (UTC)

Wasn't I berating you about this before, though? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101028 - 14:11 (UTC)

Berating? Should I bring schnapps? Presently not disGruntled - Exchange ideas 18:13, 29 Octodest 2010 (UTC)

Whassat? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101029 - 21:04 (UTC)

Schnapps is a liqueur, used to placate demons. Presently not disGruntled - Exchange ideas 23:26, 31 Octodest 2010 (UTC)

Maybe you were berating me at some point. You know, this article has caused a lot of berating. I think.-- (Talk) (Contributions) 06:21, 1 Novelniver 2010 (UTC)

Oh... I see. If you'd like; berating is just a fun endeavour in general. I know I'll take any excuse... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101101 - 07:11 (UTC)