| For:
|
- I like this article. It is good. Hence I am voting for. Also, I love how the writer stays in character wonderfully throughout, and wonder why I never noticed this article before. -- Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 09:00, 4 Ergust 2010 (UTC)
- teh awe and then some Testostereich • (ballsack) 10:31, 4 Ergust 2010 (UTC)
- something tells me t3 didn't write this. —rms talk 21:02, 5 Ergust 2010 (UTC)
- Excellent time for me to return, I guess. Also, vote yes. --Thekillerfruitcake 09:12, 11 Ergust 2010 (UTC)
- Article is win. --Bagelman talk to me ! 20:42, 11 Ergust 2010 (UTC)
- Am I doing this right? Im a bit tad rusty. Great ArtiClat. I laughed. Smepp!--
 |Fonchezzz| Quacking| 00:14, 12 Ergust 2010 (UTC)
- Its a great article that deserves to be featured. simsilikesims 04:20, 13 Serpeniver 2010 (UTC)
- Mmm, I liked this one when I saw it on uncyclopedia, and I like it here. And as it was only a spork there, voting for it here seems entirely proper. Or something. ~
 *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20100914 - 00:47 (UTC)
- Kerpow. You Silly, Twisted Boy, You. 09:10, 29 Serpeniver 2010 (UTC)
|
