Talk:An article with unsightly formatting

From Illogicopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

nice... it even screwed up the WTH formatting :P MetalFlower.jpg

Heh, actually for some reason the template doesn't work for articles with more than one word (ie a space) in the title. I ought to mention this to someone, but I'm too busy clipping my toenails. -- Hindleyak  Converse?blogClick here! 11:49, 13 Yoon 2007 (UTC)
There you go. --Fluffalizer 15:32, 13 Yoon 2007 (UTC)

Oh god, my eyes. But hey, check out the old timers up there ↑ —rms talk 22:44, 20 Yoon 2011 (UTC)

The edit warring that occurred over this apartment six years later[edit source]

I happen to agree with Mr Cat's point that most of the Kamelopedia templates these days seem somwehat irrelevant. However, since this edit war seems as if it'll never reach any sort of solution, I might add that the Kamel templates on this article nicely add to the unsightliness of it all (especially with the WTH template right next to it), with or without nuts relevancy. -That. Was. AWESOME! (talk) 07:37, 29 Novelniver 2013 (UTC)

You may be right about that. There comes a point in an edit war when all you can see is that you're right and the other person's wrong, so wrong that they must be stopped or else everything will fall to pieces, and it is then that you must not make any final decision, because the mental spiders have spun their web of partiality all through your head and you have no choice but to look through it, and when you have looked through it long enough you begin to forget that there was ever anything more to see.  Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 12:56, 29 Novelniver 2013 (UTC)
Yes, I tend to agree with Decks. The article is supposed to be ugly and pointless and horribly formatted and the Kamel link adds to it. However, I also agree with that the Kamel link is getting used too often and should be scaled back in the future. Not every single article needs to link to its German counterpart. --Mars Cadbury (talk) 16:52, 29 Novelniver 2013 (UTC)
I believe that the KP is actually obsolete now. It can be pared down to as little as three, namely this one, Camel, and User:Alicia Keys. And in these cases, a vestige (coding that would create a template) can be used.

Kate (talk) 17:02, 29 Novelniver 2013 (UTC)