| Score: -1 (4-5)
|
Nomination by P00psicle (talk) 18:17, 4 Aym 2013 (UTC)
|
| For:
|
- I like the article ???, if that's what you meant. ❦ Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 02:32, 14 Novelniver 2013 (UTC)
- For. Profit. -That. Was. AWESOME! (talk) 04:49, 14 Novelniver 2013 (UTC)
- The utility of seeing a bunch of question marks on the front page outweighs the altruism of JIT manufacturing philosophy. Irrgardless that irregardless is not a word, henceforth, forsooth and do not tarry.
 17:43, 17 Arche 2014 (UTC)
|
| Against:
|
- Against Aside from it being a rip off of AAAAAAAAA, me thinks the days of one letter or character on a page a few hundred times making me laugh are over. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:13, 12 Ditzimber 2013 (UTC)
- No. Peshwari naans for all I know.
 Sincerely, islandmonkey - go speak 20:55, 18 Ditzimber 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry I'm being so harsh But this article isn't feature worthy.--
 |Fonchezzz| Quacking| 15:16, 23 Aym 2014 (UTC)
- I've seen articles ten times worse than this not get featured. --T3 06:55, 4 Jumbly 2014 (UTC)
- I have given this a lot of thought and I am going to have to go with no. It's definitely interesting but I really don't think it is a feature. @Marzipan (talk) 08:39, 6 Ergust 2014 (UTC)
|
| Comments:
|
|
