Score: 3 (5-2)
|
Nomination by The Bard of Illogicopedia 18:30, 10 Jeremy 2013 (UTC)
|
For:
|
- For. I find this one strangely compelling and marginally useful. ~ The Bard of Illogicopedia 18:30, 10 Jeremy 2013 (UTC)
- Yes. -That. Was. AWESOME! (talk) 06:50, 1 Novelniver 2013 (UTC)
- Seems ok. I like it. ❦ Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 19:56, 13 Novelniver 2013 (UTC)
- For The words ... well, I didn't exactly read the whole thing, so I don't have a lot to say about the words, but that classic picture (classic = been copied so many times nobody can remember where it came from) is priceless. Snarglefoop (talk) 21:35, 10 Farbleum 2014 (UTC)
- Yep. --T3 06:58, 4 Jumbly 2014 (UTC)
|
Against:
|
- Against Aside from the brevity in many of the sections, I don't be liking the amount of redlinks I'm seeing. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:35, 5 Novelniver 2013 (UTC)
- 'Against - Meh. This article does nothing for me. My dog liked it, but she licks her own butt, so... 15:41, 13 Novelniver 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments:
|
Isn't there another nomination page for this somewhere? wasn't thinking. ❦ Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 19:55, 13 Novelniver 2013 (UTC)
|