Forum talk:Worst Article Ever
Actually... why only one vote? We're nominating quite a few, after all, and more as we go... ~ talk) • (stalk) • (block) • ( -- 6 Novelniver 2010 - 20:57 (UTC)
- Quite too logical, since worst implies singularity. Maybe rename it worstests and catsup packets? Presently not disGruntled - Exchange ideas 21:05, 6 Novelniver 2010 (UTC)
If this article actually wins the vote, will the world collapse in upon itself before my brain does? -- Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 21:32, 6 Novelniver 2010 (UTC)
- Perhaps. It would be a bit strange and ironic the voting page itself winning. However, Brooke and Franklin D. Roosevelt seem to be tied for lead as of now.--Colonel Sanders 21:36, 6 Novelniver 2010 (UTC)
- *shifty eyes* ~ talk) • (stalk) • (block) • ( -- 6 Novelniver 2010 - 21:42 (UTC)
- Thing is, none of the articles on this page are as bad as poor joke. Now that's irony. Or perhaps not? -- Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 21:44, 6 Novelniver 2010 (UTC)
- Not really, I think. One must admit, all the articles being voted on are awful. Now, the voting page has a vote and is tied with the other two. Strange.--Colonel Sanders 21:48, 6 Novelniver 2010 (UTC)
- My walrus thing isn't that bad, is it? ~ talk) • (stalk) • (block) • ( -- 6 Novelniver 2010 - 21:55 (UTC)
- Not really. I admit Brooke and FDR are worse. Meh.--Colonel Sanders 22:06, 6 Novelniver 2010 (UTC)
- If you say so... but the joke sure is bad. ~ talk) • (stalk) • (block) • ( -- 6 Novelniver 2010 - 22:29 (UTC)
- What joke, exactly?--Colonel Sanders 22:31, 6 Novelniver 2010 (UTC)
- The poor one. ~ talk) • (stalk) • (block) • ( -- 6 Novelniver 2010 - 22:53 (UTC)
- Ahh. Care to check your horoscope?--Colonel Sanders 23:05, 6 Novelniver 2010 (UTC)
- Merp. ~ talk) • (stalk) • (block) • ( -- 7 Novelniver 2010 - 04:10 (UTC)
- Merp? What do you think of All the crappy articles rolled into one?--Colonel Sanders 04:40, 7 Novelniver 2010 (UTC)
- Merp. ~ talk) • (stalk) • (block) • ( -- 7 Novelniver 2010 - 04:10 (UTC)
- Ahh. Care to check your horoscope?--Colonel Sanders 23:05, 6 Novelniver 2010 (UTC)
- The poor one. ~ talk) • (stalk) • (block) • ( -- 6 Novelniver 2010 - 22:53 (UTC)
- Not really. I admit Brooke and FDR are worse. Meh.--Colonel Sanders 22:06, 6 Novelniver 2010 (UTC)
- My walrus thing isn't that bad, is it? ~ talk) • (stalk) • (block) • ( -- 6 Novelniver 2010 - 21:55 (UTC)
- Not really, I think. One must admit, all the articles being voted on are awful. Now, the voting page has a vote and is tied with the other two. Strange.--Colonel Sanders 21:48, 6 Novelniver 2010 (UTC)
- Thing is, none of the articles on this page are as bad as poor joke. Now that's irony. Or perhaps not? -- Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 21:44, 6 Novelniver 2010 (UTC)
- *shifty eyes* ~ talk) • (stalk) • (block) • ( -- 6 Novelniver 2010 - 21:42 (UTC)
Well[edit source]
If no one else votes soon, I'm going to declare winner.--Teh Chicken Magnate, The Honorable Colonel Sanders 14:12, 12 Novelniver 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, give it more time. It could well make for a funny monthly thing, but at very least, have you not noticed how lazy some of us are? I haven't even gotten around to digging up more yet... ~ talk) • (stalk) • (block) • ( -- 12 Novelniver 2010 - 17:29 (UTC)
Lurg.[edit source]
Is it about time to declare winner? I expect no more votes.--Colonel Sanders/Colonel Battaleaxe 03:58, 4 Farbleum 2011 (UTC)
- Probably. I could make a giant blob for whoever wrote said winner, but then you might wonder why I never got around to making those ?science templates, so I won't mention anything and just... sidle out, now. *whistles* ~ 06:32, 4 Farbleum 2011
Worst Idea Ever[edit source]
I suppose it's unavoidable that every breakaway rebel—whether a teenager or a humour site—eventually comes to resemble what it tried to free itself from in the first place... Illogicopedia was founded to be rid of this sort of elitist wankery. Is this really the direction we're going in? --The Bard of Illogicopedia 01:20, 27 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)
- Whuh?--Colonel Sanders 01:40, 27 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)
- Did Uncyclopedia do something like this too, or something? ~ 02:32, 27 Jumbly 2011
- Vote for Deletion, Forest Fire Week... angry villagers with torches gathering around shouting,"Hey, this sucks!" What happened to editing articles to make them funnier? Besides, we don't get nearly enough traffic on this wiki to have the luxury of offending and driving away our active usership. --The Bard of Illogicopedia 09:32, 27 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)
- This ain't hatin'. It's just a fun little thing.--Colonel Sanders 01:55, 31 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)
- Glad to hear it. ~ The Bard of Illogicopedia 04:10, 31 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)
- First on the delete list, as voted by /you/ --Silent PenguinLeave Me Alone 14:39, 31 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)
- Glad to hear it. ~ The Bard of Illogicopedia 04:10, 31 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)
- This ain't hatin'. It's just a fun little thing.--Colonel Sanders 01:55, 31 Jumbly 2011 (UTC)
Oh right, I geddit now[edit source]
This is a great big article pimping exercise, isn't it? Meh, continue as you were. -- Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 20:27, 14 Ergust 2011 (UTC)
- Oh no! He's figured it out! Hide the lumber! ~ 03:41, 15 Ergust 2011