This is the place where you get to nominate and vote on which images go on the front page.
Cool! So how does this work?[edit | edit source]
Well, someone nominates an image and the rest of us discuss whether it should go on the front page, saying whether we like it or not and voting yay or nay. You can use for and against if you are boring like.
Add a new level 2 heading with the image's title and paste the following code:
{{vfi|image name.jpg|350|Image title|caption|User}}
Where "350" is the image width in pixels and can be adjusted according the the image. If the pic you are nominating does not have a caption make one up or just put a basic one and mention that it requires a better comment.
More information including nomming regulations can be found here.
New ones at the top, folks.
Score: +1
Score: +2.66
- Nooom and fooor I am stuck with the idea that there is nothing better than psychedelic snail gifs. ☃☃☃ (talk) 11:19, 24 Yoon 2015 (UTC)
- Two-thirds for At least it's not Flabebe.
Operator XY - (Conversal :: Editations - 7,284 and counting!) 22:37, 14 Farbleum 2016 (UTC)
- OH GOD IT'S WRECKING MY EYEBALLS... for. :P -- Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 13:02, 11 Jeremy 2019 (UTC)
Score: +2 eyes
- Nom and for I
uploaded made it! Iamawesome T | C | U 08:44, 4 Arply 2015 (UTC)
- Yes u n00b.
~ Good tidings! ~ 06:38, 5 Arply 2015 (UTC)
- Yes Actually illogical, unlike many featured or nominated-to-be-featured images. P00psicle (talk) 04:57, 28 Aym 2017 (UTC)
Score: +2
- Self Nommers also fore I think it'd be nice to have a new featured image to add to the mix... I like this one.--
|Fonchezzz| Quacking| 16:36, 14 Jumbly 2014 (UTC)
- Fœr Mallador the burninator? ~ Good tidings! ~ 17:56, 14 Jumbly 2014 (UTC)
Score: +2
- NOMmyfor - What the hell? Why not?
18:34, 17 Arche 2014 (UTC)
- For: biggest goddamn mood i've ever seen :: Felis Lupis (talk) 20:00, 28 Arply 2021 (UTC)
Score: +3
- NOMmyfor - I didn't make it, but this is still pretty much vanity. Made me laugh though, and its about time one of the cakeisalie pictures was featured at least. Testostereich • (ballsack) 12:55, 3 Yoon 2010 (UTC)
- 4' the epitome of inside jokes —rms talk 23:14, 3 Yoon 2010 (UTC)
- The square root of 16 - I liked my response better than this but this did make me laugh out loud (as the youngins say). --T3 20:20, 4 Yoon 2010 (UTC)
Score: 1 sinister prophets
- Self Nom and For - This is legitimately made by me, although the skill involved belies a talent none of you other ?pedians have shown. Monsignor Onslow Peaches - Speak slowly into the tube 20:12, 9 Serpeniver 2011 (UTC)
- For But for the record, yooinks! Flutter ₧: over 9000
03:41, 5 Ditzimber 2013 (EDT)
Score: 1 sleeping viewers
- See here for featured images or here for failed attempts.
