Score: 5 (8-3)
|
Nomination by ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101020 - 23:45 (UTC)
|
For:
|
- Nom and emphatic for. Something like this is too good not to feature. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101020 - 23:45 (UTC)
- Foore Short and stupid. -- 15:31, 23 Octodest 2010 (UTC)
- For. I've decided.-- (Talk) (Contributions) 22:32, 23 Octodest 2010 (UTC)
- Fur Not feature-worthy. Not very disGruntled - Exchange ideas 02:56, 24 Novelniver 2010 (UTC)
- STORNG FONRG --THE 03:20, 22 Ditzimber 2010 (UTC)
Z'ok - For being tangential and marketed by Nike. Not very disGruntled - Exchange ideas 18:18, 19 Farbleum 2011 (UTC)
- You already voted, silly. Why the hell we have votes is beyond me, though... ~ 18:53, 19 Farbleum 2011
- Fucking genius. --Mortalmm000 16:24, 28 Arche 2011 (UTC)
- For irony. simsilikesims 01:57, 27 Arply 2011 (UTC)
- Fore! --T3 03:00, 1 Aym 2011 (UTC)
- VOTE!! VOTE VOTE VOTE --Nerd42 15:07, 6 Aym 2011 (UTC)
|
Against:
|
(UTC)
- meh —rms talk 01:02, 21 Octodest 2010 (UTC)
- *sniffle* How could you?! *runs away, sobbing* ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101021 - 01:37 (UTC)
- CAT FENCE - HAT WENT - HAG ENT - AG AINST - yeah Testostereich • (ballsack) 16:59, 23 Octodest 2010 (UTC)
- After much consideration, I don't think the joke is strong enough. Sorry. I mean, it's chuckleworthy and all but should it be on the front page? Not sure. -- Hindleyak Converse • ?blog • Click here! 12:08, 8 Arply 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments:
|
- For, I mean Against, I mean... I CAN'T CHOOSE! It'd be funny to have it featured, but... I don't know.-- (Talk) (Contributions) 03:45, 21 Octodest 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, come on... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101021 - 05:22 (UTC)
- I think I will vote eventually, but I'll see which way everyone else goes first.-- (Talk) (Contributions) 07:16, 21 Octodest 2010 (UTC)
- It may not be here anymore if you do that, though. The admins are coming back! They're coming back! It's preparation for the end times! *flails* ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101021 - 16:19 (UTC)
- Note: The cool people with all of the features and junk are opposed to this article getting featured. Maybe because we're awesome! —rms talk 05:29, 14 Aym 2011 (UTC)
- Well, I'm... prettier than you! ~ 08:34, 14 Aym 2011
- Crap, uh... we need a feature... er... PAGEPAGEPAGE! *flees* ~ 08:40, 14 Aym 2011
|