| For:
|
- For Summarises the concept of cake for me. I'm impressed. --
  21:21, 2 Jeremy 2013 (UTC)
- 4 ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:05, 2 Jeremy 2013 (UTC)
- Most definitely. I have no idea how I couldn't support this. Is the typo in the title to be taken as meaningful in some obtuse and discontinent fashion? -— Athyria
  04:55, 3 Jeremy 2013 (UTC)
- For number four. -That. Was. AWESOME! (talk) 10:08, 19 Ditzimber 2013 (UTC)
- Cuz. Cake is awesome, also i wish i had one rite now. —Flutter ₧: over 9000
 22:27, 19 Arche 2014 (EDT)
- 87.64.84.205 11:31, 22 Aym 2014 (UTC)
|
| Against:
|
- Against, although impressive, I still have some dignity for the site and enjoy articles with more content on the front page. —rms talk 00:55, 5 Jeremy 2013 (UTC)
- I'm with RMS. I was known to vote against on articles that were nominated for feature as kind of a joke when I was active here, and that hasn't changed. --T3 06:28, 13 Yoon 2013 (UTC)
- It's more a picture gallery than an article. ❦ Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 20:30, 13 Novelniver 2013 (UTC)
- Against There's just one joke, and it's in the title, and it can't carry the whole page. Seriously, I typed 'cake' into google images and the result was indistinguishable from this page (except for the logo at the top). And neither one made me laugh. Snarglefoop (talk) 22:20, 10 Farbleum 2014 (UTC)
- Against I might vote for this article if some of the cakes might be remotely humorous. But, they're ordinary cakes. Sadness. тяιρρуƒℓσωєя (talk) 02:42, 27 Arche 2014 (UTC)
- That's a no Good article, not the right kind of insanity we should put on the front page.--
 |Fonchezzz| Quacking| 15:13, 23 Aym 2014 (UTC)
|
21:21, 2 Jeremy 2013 (UTC)
