Forum:Illogicopedian of the Month

<<< Back to Department of Limelight • <<< Back to Forum

The winner will be awarded an amusingly shaped trophy.

The Illogicopedian of the Month award covers article writing ability but also encompasses all other aspects of Illogicopedian culture.

Until the last day of Arply, users may vote and/or nominate a user which they feel has made significant contributions to the wiki this month. Contrary to popular belief, a single user can win the award more than once. In other words, who has made you laugh the most in the last few weeks? Who has impressed you most with their wiki coding? Who has been most proficient in reverting vandalism?

Oh yeah, and don't vote for someone just because they're your mate or something. They have to, you know, deserve a Golden Banana. From doing good stuff.

We ask those who didn't win to console themselves in the fact that there is always this month. But congratulations to our latest winner of the Illogicopedian of the Month award, Flingers, who received the rather amusingly (and tastily) shaped trophy to display on their userpages forever!

Awards!

As well as being named the Illogicopedia Writer of the Month, winners will receive:

• An amusingly shaped trophy and the right to display it on your userpage.
• A kick up the backside from everyone else.
• Becoming a Phantom, which awards quick rollback ability.
• A Ferrari! It's invisible, though.

Past winners of amazitoode

• See here for all winners of this award.

Votin'

Please note that the multiple vote rule is no longer in effect.

VOTING REGULATIONS

There is voting currently taking place below this template, So here are the voting basics: Users are permitted one vote each. Please clearly state whether your addition is a for, an against or a comment. Remember to sign and to update the vote count. Nominations count as a vote for unless specified as "Neutral" or "Against". Take care not to overdo self-nomination. If you wish to change your vote, then cross out the previous using the <s> tags. Frog-infested pineapples are not allowed in the voting area until they have been de-frogged. Click here for more details

Official nominations for January

THE (Talk • Contribs • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 4

• What can I say? I like his writing. ~ 17:40, 10 Jeremy 2011
• For-Why not? THE is a good fellow and his writings are rather... interesting.--Colonel Sanders/Colonel Battaleaxe 18:20, 10 Jeremy 2011 (UTC)
• For Well, there's really no one else. And yes, his writings are rather good.-- (Talk) (Contributions) 04:30, 28 Jeremy 2011 (UTC)
• And now for an actual for - good writer, useful werewolf, lovely nutter in general... yeah. ~ 15:58, 28 Jeremy 2011
• Fur - Pancreatic verisimilitude. Not very disGruntled - Exchange ideas 00:28, 31 Jeremy 2011 (UTC)

Nerd42 (Talk • Contribs • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom and for. Okay people, inside jokes aside, I really liked Nerd's episode of the Illogicast, hence I am nomming him. YES. He's also done some articles. Not to demean your work this month, THE, but I wanted to spice things up a bit here. -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 11:47, 29 Jeremy 2011 (UTC)
• Comment. Yeah, he's done well enough for a change that he could even avoid the automatic against votes... astounding. ~ 18:41, 29 Jeremy 2011

  Wow, I detect a strong hatred for Nerd here. Do you lot not know he is the messiah? -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 12:29, 30 Jeremy 2011 (UTC)

  People hate messiahs, dontcha know? Although it looks like I was wrong, anyhow... dang. ~ 15:57, 30 Jeremy 2011

  He's not the messiah, he's a very naughty boy! --Silent PenguinLeave Me Alone 16:58, 30 Jeremy 2011 (UTC)

• Against I agree, he has done great.--Ben ^Blade 13:31, 30 Jeremy 2011 (UTC)

Gomphog (Talk • Contribs • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Self nom and for. I twist my left nipple to tune into BBC Radio 2 --Gomphog 12:58, 30 Jeremy 2011 (UTC)

Comment: The above nomination was made by Gomphog, so we can assume that's a self nom and for, I guess. Gomps, come and confirm this or else it's the ants. -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 12:28, 30 Jeremy 2011 (UTC)