Illogicopedia:Votes for Feature

This is for articles; see also: Illogicopedia:Featured images

This section is Logical; it is meant to be so. Prepare to get bored!

Sensible Section

This page displays all of the current votes. See Forum:Department of Limelight for a summary index of nominated articles and the other non-article-vote-related things handled there.

Previous article nominations can be found here - or separately, the featured, the ones waiting to be featured and the ones that failed. This category tree also contains all nominated pages and their votes. (Useful for checking that the VFF template has been added/removed correctly.)

For how to feature or fail an article, see here.

Nomination

Enter the full name of the article below (Make sure to use proper capitalization.) and then click "Nominate", then follow the instructions on the next page to create the entry. If the page already exists, you can either try to fix the "Revoting" option or give up.

Revolting

If you think a previously failed nomination has a chance at winning a revote, you can re-nominate it below. (note that repeated renomination of a page without good reason is frowned upon – a review of the article is recommended) Once again, enter the full name of the article below (make sure to use proper capitalization) and click "Revote", then follow the instructions on the next page to create the entry.

Current votes

VOTING REGULATIONS

There is voting currently taking place below this template, So here are the voting basics: Users are permitted one vote each. Please clearly state whether your addition is a for, an against or a comment. Remember to sign and to update the vote count. Nominations count as a vote for unless specified as "Neutral" or "Against". Take care not to overdo self-nomination. If you wish to change your vote, then cross out the previous using the <s> tags. Frog-infested pineapples are not allowed in the voting area until they have been de-frogged. Click here for more details

Captain Censor (vote)

Score: 0 (1-1)	Nomination by 162.233.177.60 22:15, 3 Arche 2021 (UTC)
For:	EPIC -162.233.177.60 22:15, 3 Arche 2021 (UTC)
Against:	Just kinda meh. But that's just my opinion. CG098 (talk ☼‎ contribs) 01:26, 4 Arche 2021 (UTC)
Comments:	I kinda like the idea dude, you know how I love the wikicode gimmick stuff. But maybe it's missing somethin'. -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 19:15, 7 Aym 2026 (UTC)

Avril Lavigne Reference Desk (vote)

Score: 2 (2-0)	Nomination by Operator XY - (Conversal :: Editations - Special:Editcount/XY007 and counting!) 01:00, 6 Arche 2016 (UTC)
For:	Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri I quite like this article. Though it'd be best served renaming it to Avril Lavigne and Summer Glau Reference Desk. This ends the pre-recorded message by Operator XY - (Conversal :: Editations - Special:Editcount/XY007 and counting!) 01:00, 6 Arche 2016 (UTC) OK, yeah. I remember this from a while back. :) -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 12:54, 11 Jeremy 2019 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:	This seems to be a parody of Wikipedia's reference desk. I'm not enough into pop culture to really appreciate this, I shouldn't think. ❦ Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 00:15, 18 Yoon 2018 (UTC) This was nominated ten years ago, is it too late to feature it now? I still like it but we kinda missed the time to highlight it, probably? -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 18:35, 7 Aym 2026 (UTC)

Good electricity and bad electricity (vote)

Score: 2.5 (2.5-0)	Nomination by (kaizum me) 15:40, 4 Jeremy 2016 (UTC)
For:	For - A dazzling surreal dip into the story of elextrikity. (kaizum me) 15:40, 4 Jeremy 2016 (UTC) Decent enough. ❦ Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 04:03, 8 Jumbly 2018 (UTC) Half-For: i'm not sure why but this one vibes with me. something feels off though :: Felis Lupis (talk) 19:53, 28 Arply 2021 (UTC) For. Niece one :) Taxworm (talk) 09:33, 29 Octodest 2022 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:	Ehm... abstain for now. I don't see the relative merits of THIS article, but it's OK. Operator XY - (Conversal :: Editations - Special:Editcount/XY007 and counting!) 00:34, 6 Jeremy 2016 (UTC) Could it really be that we feature an article deleted from Uncyclopedia? I mean, it would be a statement and a half... :D -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 18:32, 7 Aym 2026 (UTC)

Nerds (vote)

Score: -1 (1-2)	Nomination by 2600:4040:937B:1B00:6D4A:20F6:688C:374D 22:16, 5 Arply 2023 (UTC)
For:
Against:	No. Too tedious. CG098 (talk ☼‎ contribs) 15:55, 6 Arply 2023 (UTC) I mean it's interesting but maybe not for the front page. -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 17:25, 3 Aym 2026 (UTC)
Comments:

butter (vote)

Score: 1 (2-1)	Nomination by Rrrrrrmf kjfrjnf (talk) 15:11, 29 Arche 2022 (UTC)
For:	Haha yes Doctor DUuH 03:54, 11 Ditzimber 2022 (UTC) Absolute yes Taxworm (talk) 09:58, 11 Ditzimber 2022 (UTC)
Against:	Idanno, seems kind of 'of its time' these days... -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 17:23, 3 Aym 2026 (UTC)
Comments:

Sayings (vote)

Score: 2 (2-0)	Nomination by Fredisfredisfred (talk) 14:42, 27 Octodest 2023 (UTC)
For:	For. I like the way he/she incorporates the sayings into it. Yeah that's pretty witty, for. -- Hindleyak  Converse • ?blog • Click here! 17:21, 3 Aym 2026 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:

! (video game) (vote)

Score: 1 (1-0)	Nomination by Fluffalizer 16:28, 20 Serpeniver 2023 (UTC)
For:	Well played. --Fluffalizer 16:28, 20 Serpeniver 2023 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:	The images don't show for me, looking blank, but the smaller thumbnails on the file pages work. It would be better with unbroken images. --Fluffalizer 16:28, 20 Serpeniver 2023 (UTC)

Mort (vote)

Score: 2 (2-0)	Nomination by Bobo Monkey
For:	Bobo Monkey --Bobo (talk / stalk) This is great. Taxworm (talk) 20:57, 9 Novelniver 2022 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:

Alcoholic monkeys (vote)

Score: 1 (1-0)	Nomination by Fenris2010 (talk) 02:12, 19 Ergust 2024 (UTC)
For:	For.  Fenris2010 Tell Fenris2010 to stop stealing monkeys. 02:12, 19 Ergust 2024 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:

Pasta (vote)

Score: 0 (0-0)	Nomination by 216.125.34.183 14:37, 14 Arply 2022 (UTC)
For:	funny 96.61.23.221 21:52, 24 Farbleum 2025 (UTC) 216.125.34.183 14:37, 14 Arply 2022 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:

Not so Fairy Tales (vote)

Score: 1.5 (2.5-1)	Nomination by Fiery Meme (talk) 02:01, 22 Farbleum 2018 (UTC)
For:	Yes. Because this article exists. I need no other reason--The preceding unsigned comment was left by Fiery Meme (talk | stalk), see the past frenzies page for posting time Miniature-for It's a solid article, but it could do with a picture or two. XY007 (talk - contribs - business) 04:23, 22 Farbleum 2018 (UTC) For. How many?--The preceding unsigned comment was left by Sophia (talk | stalk), see the past frenzies page for posting time
Against:	On rereading this, I'd rather not. It gets off to a good start, but a lot of it seems to consist of a poop joke. I might add images later. ❦ Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 18:50, 10 Arche 2019 (UTC)
Comments:	Sitting on the fence. It's pointy. I edited it a bit. The article, not the fence. How do you edit a fence? ❦ Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 18:34, 8 Jumbly 2018 (UTC)

ISO (vote)

Score: 4 (4-0)	Nomination by Taxworm (talk) 09:18, 19 Novelniver 2022 (UTC)
For:	Om nom nom and For. Dr. DUuH suggested this. Taxworm (talk) 09:18, 19 Novelniver 2022 (UTC) For. #ISO. Doctor DUuH For. Per Dr. DUuH. Tails6000D (T C E) 01:45, 3 Ditzimber 2022 (UTC) honestly not even that bad and actually pretty good. no substance but doesnt need it for its contents Deadmau5 (talk) 14:20, 22 Serpeniver 2025 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:

The Stranger (vote)

Score: 2 (2-0)	Nomination by Nothinggetspastyou (talk) 06:59, 17 Ditzimber 2018 (UTC)
For:	self nom & for sure why not That's some white men all right. ❦ Flyingcat (meow?)fr: 02:51, 2 Jeremy 2019 (UTC)
Against:
Comments:

---